[templar]

Actually, the M-14 (that is, the M-1 Garand with it's problems fixed) is the best all-purpose small arm in the world.

The M-14 is an excellent battle rifle, but I'd go for the FAL any day (I've owned both in semi auto, still have the FAL. I've fired both in full auto versions, the FAL is useable, the M14 is almost uncontrollable). Neither would be my choice for any close quarters combat, just too long and too much recoil to go at it in 10 foot rooms easily. Personally, I'd prefer the Krinkov AK variant for urban assault use, heavier caliber than the little sub guns but still small, quick handling, and controllable.

In any case, I'd prefer the AK (either 47 or 74) over the M16 for extended rough duty in an adverse environment.

[Lazamataz]

You and I think nearly perfectly alike, except I would select an MP-5 for urban assault.

[Lazamataz]

Oh, I also think the M-14 slightly edges out the FAL, although I do love the FAL. I had one once.

[RANGERAIRBORNE]

You are talking about essentially SWAT team tactics- clearing buildings room by room. For that, the MP5 is great (or the UZI). But I'm talking about a real combat rifle with some range and a few extra foot-pounds of energy at 300 or 400 meters to take an enemy out of the fight. Not everything is CQB, even in Iraq.

I would hunt moose with an M14, but not with any of these varmint cartridges...