Replies

But by publicly (here) 'representing', like it or not, atheism due to your posts, one can clearly extrapolate that you are not necessarily 'non' God, you are actually 'anti-God'. Again, based on the tone and substance of your earlier posts in this thread. Are you from a separate 'stream' of atheistic thought? PS did you just ammend your personal page to reflect those viewpoints? It seems you added some material on just now (perhaps I am mistaken). Thank you.

"But by publicly (here) 'representing', like it or not, atheism due to your posts, one can clearly extrapolate that you are not necessarily 'non' God, you are actually 'anti-God'. Again, based on the tone and substance of your earlier posts in this thread. Are you from a separate 'stream' of atheistic thought? PS did you just ammend your personal page to reflect those viewpoints? It seems you added some material on just now (perhaps I am mistaken). Thank you.
"

I did just add a paragraph to my information, to clarify this very issue. It seems appropriate.

I am not anti-God. I don't really care what deity you believe in. I do care if it is your intent to insist that I somehow acknowlege your deity in a place where I am compelled to attend. I will never do so. As for this particular circumstance, with the Alamaba monument, I am happy to let the courts decide whether that monument represents establishment or not. I will, as always, abide by the decisions of our justice system. If I disagree with those decisions, I will endeavor to change the law.