Replies

By subjugating the people of Alabama to the unconstitutional edict by Judge Thompson, that public officials may not acknowledge God, the attorney general and my colleagues have made the fiat opinion of a judge supreme over the text of the Constitution. While agreeing with me that the Constitution is supreme, and that the opinion of Judge Thompson was contrary to the Constitution, the attorney general has argued that he must follow an order he himself believes to be in direct violation of the supreme law of the land.

This is the crux of the issue.

Moore's Constititution says in its text, "Almighty God." The U.S. Constitition says, "Lord."

How can it be unconstitutional to acknowledge what the texts themselves acknowledge.

How can the texts be the supreme law of the land if a judge rules the texts don't contain what they clearly contain.

Interesting. The liberals fear God it seems and not in a good way. I guess there will be no swearing to tell the "Whole truth, nothing but the whole truth so help me GOD" in that courtroom. Judge Thompson needs a good swift kick in the heinie.

Romans 13:1 Let every person be loyally subject to the governing (civil) authorities. For there is no authority except from God [by His permission, His sanction], and those that exist do so by God's appointment."

In my eyes, Roy Moore see's himself, and has placed himself, above the position for which he was elected. See verse above.

He has turned the Ten Commandments into a graven image. People are more worried about that monument than the fact that their neighbors are going to hell. So much for the Great Commission.

Christians have threatened to halt the removal of the monument. Obstructing civil law? See verse above.

How many of the Ten Commandments are our laws based upon?