Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) California Recall - A Fair And Balanced Look at FR
Me | me

Posted on 08/23/2003 11:27:34 AM PDT by freedumb2003

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Precisian
I agree with most of your analysis, except the hysterial Aztlan bunk. You are too smart to wave the anti-Hispanic flag.
I know as many hard-right Hispanics as I do hard-left Socialists.
Stay away from tripping the Latino alarm

My WIFE is from Mexico, so don't give me that "some of my best friends are...." stuff. It is a documented FACT that Bustamante was a member of MECHA, which calls for the return of Alta California (part of Aztlan) to Mexico. And he has been given chances to distance himself from that stance and has not.

He IS a racist and he DOES want to return California to Mexico.

21 posted on 08/23/2003 3:53:57 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Tom would be a prime candidate to unseat BOXER!

You know, THAT is a great idea. We should be grooming Tom for THAT seat and use this run to set the foundation.

I'll be adjuting my political calculus with that as the target.

Thanks and I'll spread the word!

22 posted on 08/23/2003 3:57:03 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
A better scenario is that Arnold takes McClintock into his inner circle and that McClintock ends his run

That sentence says it all.

Do we want to win or not?

23 posted on 08/23/2003 3:57:26 PM PDT by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I'll buy that for a dollar.
24 posted on 08/23/2003 4:00:07 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
Nice summary. Would you mind doing one for the creationist / evolutionist threads?

Sure, but Tom Weller in Science made Stupid (Hugo Award winner 1986) already covered that ground much better than I could ever have:

Evolutionism
Evolutionists hold that man arose by the same gradual process as other creatures. This belief follows from the principle that the same laws of nature apply to man as to the rest of the physical world.

The Evolutionist Model... demonstrates how an ancestral "ape-man" could have evolved an upright stance and humanlike physiology. However, it does not explain the tremendous expansion of the intellect and other intangibles that characterize humanity.

Creationism
Creationists, on the other hand, believe that man was created instantaneously by a cosmic powered super-being from another dimension. This belief is based on ancient, heavily retranslated writings taken from badly decomposed fragments of scroll found in a series of caves in the middle-east.
The Creationist Model ... explains the advent of human intelligence by ascribing it to divine fiat in the creation of the first humans, Adam and Eve. A major weakness is that it fails to account for the origin of Adam and Eve's daughters-in-law.

A MODERN SOLUTION
Pictured below, we see how an open-minded approach to these conflicting theories can lead to the resolution of a major problem in each.

REQUIRED NOTICE: This account meets the statutory and regulatory requirements of all U.S. state, county and municipal school boards and districts for works dealing with the origins of man and is warranted to be suitable for use as a teaching tool in accordance with the Guidlines for De Facto Ideological Uniformity of the American Textbook Publishers Association.

25 posted on 08/23/2003 4:03:59 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I thank you.

Perhaps after you've rested a bit, we can turn your formidable powers loose on the conservative / libertarian thing...

26 posted on 08/23/2003 4:21:12 PM PDT by Interesting Times (Tag line. You're it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Hi Freedumb2003,

I agree with you on 95% of your analysis. However, if on the weekend before the election the polls show something like Arnold 30 Cruz 28 Tom 11 the only choice for me is to vote AGAINST the recall (as much as I dislike Davis) and vote for Arnold. With Cruz, CA is finished for good. With Davis still in we can maybe get on a liferaft before we exit California (the sinking Titanic). All said, I think McClintock is the best so far.

Ted (currently in San Francisco Bay Area)
in November 2003 (Cobb Couty, Georgia)

27 posted on 08/23/2003 4:51:51 PM PDT by ted1003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
LOL
28 posted on 08/23/2003 5:23:06 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Precisian
FOX and Rush are talking about it - which tells me it's not a fairy tale - as you appear to be saying. I'm not aware of Cruz's involvement in the organization, but I do know it exists and its purpose.
29 posted on 08/23/2003 5:30:57 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I never had a problem with Adam & Eve's daughter-in-laws. Adam and Eve lived to be 800 (I believe), which would allow for hundreds upon hundreds of children. Just because the Bible only names 3 of them, doesn't necessarily prove that's all the children they had. Could the in-laws have come from cousins - 10-12 removed. In European aristocracy, it was well-established that families married within families. I wonder where that idea came from ..??
30 posted on 08/23/2003 5:47:36 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ted1003; *calgov2002; AuntB; jam137; GmbyMan; DoctorZIn; fooman; PeoplesRep_of_LA; ...
Difficult choices!

calgov2002:

Gray Must Pay
Cruz Must Lose

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



31 posted on 08/23/2003 5:50:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
There are the multiple tax hike "mistakes" that Arnold's aides (not just Buffet) have made.

They look alarmingly like trial balloons. Particularly since a lot of Arnold's staff are former Wilsonites, responsible for the huge 1991 tax increase.
32 posted on 08/23/2003 6:25:25 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (TOM McCLINTOCK is my choice for governor. He should be yours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Headline Oct 8th ... DAVIS BEATS RECALL Still Governor...
33 posted on 08/23/2003 6:26:44 PM PDT by tubebender (FReepin Awesome...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Difficult choices?" Come on, Ernest! Time to get off the fence! Nothing difficult here. There is only one person who has a plan to balance the budget and do so without raising taxes and/or fees. Only one person who will void the 42 billion dollars in electrical contracts. Only one person who will cut 2/3's of the cost of workmans' comp. Only one person who will rescind the triple car tax. And Tom Mcclintock will do all this before lunch on October 8, 2003. Aunold is asking for 60 days to learn the job. We don't have 60 days to train a governor. McClintock will do more in 60 minutes than Aunold will do in 60 days. What's so difficult? The last RINO CA elected signed the largest tax bill in CA history before he got his seat warm in the governor's office. And that RINO happens to be Aunold's co-chair and advisor??? VOTE4MCCLINTOCK or pay$ the con$equence$! http://www.tommcclintock.com
34 posted on 08/23/2003 6:33:27 PM PDT by kellynla ("C" 1/5 1st Mar. Div. An Hoa, Viet Nam '69 & '70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
There is a subtle humor there -- you have to look for it.
35 posted on 08/23/2003 6:34:00 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
The thing I keep stressing, and the thing everyone seems to ignore, is what happens AFTER the election. We already know that the dems control both houses of the legislature. Tom is a good man, but he lacks charisma and when he tries to go to the people, they will pretty much ignore him.

The advantage Arnold has is his very star power. He's going to be able to make a lot more headway with the people.

We have to decide this sooner then just two weeks before the election. This is NOT a primary, it's the election itself and there's just a little more then 30 days until the election. I'd say we have to make a decision within the next week.

36 posted on 08/23/2003 6:39:08 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I have that book! Fresno (FR's HQ) even makes it in there.
37 posted on 08/23/2003 10:14:49 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (I am serious and stop calling me Shirley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I guess I'm too tired to see it; sorry!
38 posted on 08/23/2003 10:27:38 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ted1003
X42 times two didn't ruin the USA. CB won't be able to ruin CA. As a matter of fact, his behavior in Sac. might be nasty enough to stir up a lot of decent people that haven't been voting because none of the (R) candidates have been attractively conservative enough. It was X42's nastiness that got us the House - not that we've gotten as much as we wanted/expected. Disclaimer: I would get to observe CB from a distance.
39 posted on 08/23/2003 10:44:11 PM PDT by 185JHP ( "All not actually on watch, lay to your racks...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Arnold is a fiscal conservative and a social liberal

You can say it a million times but that doesn't make it true. Who says Arnold is a "fiscal conservative"!!? What office has he held that demonstrates that he is a "fiscal conservative"? What has he ever done that makes him a "fiscal conservative"?

He was the primary force behind Proposition 49 two years ago. His support of Prop. 49 definitely makes me question whether he's a "fiscal conservative" like everyone wants to claim.

40 posted on 08/23/2003 10:50:24 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson