To: Those_Crazy_Liberals
Why does it appear you hope that isn't the case with this one? Is Clinton more to your liking? Sigh. No, he's not.
NOW, will YOU answer the questions I've been trying to get you to answer all day long? I highly, highly doubt it.
43 posted on
08/22/2003 3:38:39 PM PDT by
Cathryn Crawford
(Ummm, moron. It's not free. It was paid for with taxes.)
To: Cathryn Crawford
"NOW, will YOU answer the questions I've been trying to get you to answer all day long? I highly, highly doubt it."
I sincerely thought I did. I certainly didn't answer it in the manner you wished for, or perhaps wanted me to, but I believe I did answer you. I think this exercise is a good example for all you Bush haters. If you don't get things EXACTLY the way you want or expect them to be, you stomp your feet, go to your room crying and call in all your friends.
You are a glaring example of the type of people who claim they are not out to get our President, when really you are. I have more respect for the HONEST liberals. Not much, but I do.
44 posted on
08/22/2003 4:34:25 PM PDT by
Those_Crazy_Liberals
(Ronaldus Magnus he's our man . . . If he can't do it, no one can.)
To: Cathryn Crawford
NOW, will YOU answer the questions I've been trying to get you to answer all day long? I highly, highly doubt it.Cat, the single most defining characteristic of Those_Crazy_Liberals is her complete unwillingness to defend anything she says. This is why I view her as a liberal disruptor. She merrily trips from outrageous comment to outrageous comment, and acts as if she never said any of them. Like any liberal, she thinks that she is unaccountable.
81 posted on
08/23/2003 5:59:01 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson