You may now commence the flamewar.
1 posted on
08/19/2003 8:57:07 PM PDT by
Timesink
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: Timesink
I think the three major GOP candidates poll a total 40% in the recall, hardly a plea for sanity, but then again it is California home to the fruits and nuts. Count me amongst the pessimists along with my prediction that CA sees one massive exodus of its productive to the point that it needs Federal intervention to stave off total collapse.
109 posted on
08/19/2003 10:43:14 PM PDT by
junta
(Xenophobia a perfectly reasonable response to the feckless stupidity of globalism.)
To: Timesink
California needs a SOUTHERN 10 STORY WALL!
112 posted on
08/19/2003 10:44:53 PM PDT by
Major_Risktaker
(The only way to protect my family is to protect your family.)
To: Timesink
wow a thread on Reagan and no pics? I'll fix that :>
162 posted on
08/19/2003 11:16:52 PM PDT by
KantianBurke
(The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
To: Timesink
None of this decay is surprising. The left's promises of Nirvana never measure up. But what does surprise me are the reactions of some conservatives who see California's problems as so severe that they can't be solved by the application of conservative principles. Their thinking has led them to support Arnold Schwarzenegger, who, to my knowledge, has yet to embrace any conservative positions, though he has embraced Warren Buffett. Hasta la vista, whatever, I don't think there is a question as to whether a "true" conservative could fix the problems in CA .. they could and they would do a good job.
I think the question is whether a "true" conservative could get elected at this time with the political climate that CA is in now.
But only the voters in CA can answer that question
197 posted on
08/19/2003 11:44:35 PM PDT by
Mo1
(I still hate Liberal Democrats)
To: Timesink
PING!
Join Us for a Complete Listing of All The Recall Threads.
To: Timesink
Hey Rush...there's no Ronald Reagan running in California!!!
215 posted on
08/20/2003 2:16:09 AM PDT by
The Raven
(<==click here to view)
To: Timesink; JohnHuang2; MadIvan; TonyInOhio; MeeknMing; itreei; jd792; Molly Pitcher; muggs; ...
We conservatives didn't get where we are today with this kind of thinking and we can't lead in the future with this attitude.
PiNg
217 posted on
08/20/2003 2:41:23 AM PDT by
ATOMIC_PUNK
("Lord make me fast and accurate")
To: Timesink
Bump for an amusing, if not particularly informative, thread!
219 posted on
08/20/2003 5:33:30 AM PDT by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; farmfriend; Carry_Okie
Looks like we need to run a grave yard shift...
221 posted on
08/20/2003 6:05:06 AM PDT by
tubebender
(FReepin Awesome...)
To: Timesink
I agree. And I just am not convinced Arnold is the man for the job.
To: Timesink
California gets Bustamante!
236 posted on
08/20/2003 8:53:11 AM PDT by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
To: Timesink
No flames here. Rush is right on. But of course the new GOP isn't seeing things as President Reagan saw them. The new GOP operates under the same principles as their adversary. Conservatism has taken a huge, barely recognizable, back seat to the principle of "power at any cost", even if it means pandering to the wishy washy middle and co-opting leftist ideology.
But the "party BOTS" will be on you like stink on dew I would imaging before this thread passes on to where ever they pass on when all the same old stuff has been regurgitated a couple hundred times.
Thanks for posting Rush's excellent piece.
262 posted on
08/20/2003 12:29:01 PM PDT by
ImpBill
("You are either with US or against US!")
To: Timesink
Rus is absolutely right.
We need real conservative leaders. Not those wimpy idiots that can fight their way out of a paper bag.
To: Timesink; LibTeeth
If the republicans start actually abiding by these principles I might start voting for them again.
The reason we have the largest Federal government in our history that runs up budgets somewhere in the trillions......is because we now vote NOT FOR someone......but to keep the other guy OUT. What end result do you expect?
277 posted on
08/20/2003 9:57:54 PM PDT by
missileboy
(Principio Obstate - Resist from the Beginning)
To: Timesink
Yeah all we need is another RINO .
One in the White House and add one to the State of Calif.
278 posted on
08/20/2003 10:48:49 PM PDT by
Kay Soze
(Free Republic- a gathering place conservatism & even the "go along to get along Republicans".)
To: Timesink
Absolutley Rush at his very best. Brilliant!
281 posted on
08/23/2003 6:48:45 PM PDT by
WaterDragon
(America the beautiful, I love this nation of immigrants.)
To: Timesink
And we need to keep in mind that A.S. doesn't just support abortion-on-demand because it is the law of the land....he appears to support abortions because he believes people have the right to kill off the least powerful (meaning the least important?) other people.
282 posted on
08/23/2003 6:51:43 PM PDT by
WaterDragon
(America the beautiful, I love this nation of immigrants.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson