Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BamaG
Just wait, he will challenge Richard Shelby for Senator, or at the least Bob Riley for Gov

Shelby's up for re-election next year, but would Chief Judge Moore want to be one of 100--and at the bottom of the totem pole to boot? Given how hidebound Senate rules are, he'd have difficulty being contained--and quiet. He is used to being Top Dog, and he'd definitely not be that for years in the Senate unless he intends to pull a Hillary and shove Sen. Sessions off the stage.

And, unless Riley is recalled, he's not up for re-election until 2006. Can Moore wait that long?

However, given Moore's national audience, I wonder, if he's removed by the Judicial Inquiry Commission, if he's going to do something else--speaking tours, writing, etc.

138 posted on 08/20/2003 6:51:33 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Catspaw
Well, being that Shelby is pro choice and that Moore is pro life it might not be a bad idea that he replace Shelby. Though I like Shelby it hurt my conscience to vote for him on that point alone. Too bad he had to keep that Democrat tendency when he switched parties.
139 posted on 08/20/2003 7:07:54 AM PDT by ToKillaMockingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson