[taxcontrol]

As a security 'xspert - I have worked with utilities. I have always beleived that the grids need to have several things occur to create a reliable network.

First, break the larger grids into smaller grids.

Second, duplicate the transmission grids so that each substation attaches to two local grids

Third, interconnect the local grids to larger regional grids. Create no less than 9 regional grids.

Fourth, require local grids produce 70% of their demand locally

Fifth, require power producers to connect to a minimum of three grids - both of the two local and the regional grid

Sixth, require that each of the 9 regional grids connect to at least 2 other regional grids.

Seventh, Break power production away from power delivery by requiring utilities to sell off power production facilities. Utility companies would act a bill collectors and distribute funds to power producers

Eight, Break power transmission away from the utility companies by requiring utilities to seel off grid assets. Utilities would own from the meter to the substation but would not own the lines supplying the substation. Grid companies would own the substation supply equipment (no less than two per substation) back to the power plants and grid cross connects. Power stations would only own up to the substation located at the power plant.

Ninth, require utilities to purchase power from the local grid spot market or from the local grid futures market. The grid companies would enforce the contracts.

Tenth, require 24 hr armed guards at all power plants and grid interconnect locations.

My SWAG at the cost impact would be about a 20% increase in the average national electric bill. Some locations like California and NY State would see a higher jump due to an increase in power production facilities. Other states like Texas, Washington, NV would see only slight increases due to the additional grid configuration.

Just my .02

[John O]

This sounds just like what California did. Did you forget your sarcasm tag?

As a better idea, lets replicate what Texas did across the country and break the supergrids up into state sized pieces and build more poweer plants. (preferable nukes). That way we put and end to the FERC and we get more clean power. Each state supplies for itself.

[_Jim]

Fourth, require local grids produce 70% of their demand locally

You realize, of course, that SOME of the really big problems have occurred WHEN that local generation has 'tripped' off-line and there was not enough 'spinning reserve' IN an area!

The solutions you propose are rather simplistic in view of a number of 'realities' that actually exist and would DOUBLE the cost for little return in actual improvement.

[thackney]

Second, duplicate the transmission grids so that each substation attaches to two local grids

Where would the real estate and capital come from such a project? This statement is the same as saying we can eliminate all traffic congestion in Houston by doubling all the roads.

High Voltage Transmission lines are expensive. Duplicate capacity (building twice what you need) is very expensive. Look at the houses near the substation that feeds your home. Whose houses do you intend to demolish to create this back-up that Texas has never needed?

Your other suggestions are not much beter. Thanks for playing.