[jra]

That department should buy 20 of them--that way word gets out on the street that they have them.

Assuming they got 20, the ENTIRE department could practice with them, and 4 or 5 dedicated snipers could have their OWN weapon, sighted in the way they want.

If more than 2 or 3 of these EVER get fired in an actual police operation, I'll eat my shorts.

Indianapolis PD has no need whatsoever for 200 of these weapons.

[xm177e2]

If more than 2 or 3 of these EVER get fired in an actual police operation, I'll eat my shorts.

I think you mean "If more than 2 or 3 of these EVER get fired in an actual police operation in which it is acutally appropriate to use them instead of handguns and shotguns, I'll eat my shorts."

Otherwise, I look forward to watching you eat your shorts.

[templar]

Indianapolis PD has no need whatsoever for 200 of these weapons.

Unless, maybe, they know someting we don't.

[Djarum]

If more than 2 or 3 of these EVER get fired in an actual police operation, I'll eat my shorts.

If you've got a hammer, you don't necessarily need a nail.

[philetus]

"Indianapolis PD has no need whatsoever for 200 of these weapons."

They will when they start trying to take honest citizens guns. And it's coming.

[tpaine]

Indianapolis PD has no need whatsoever for 200 of these weapons.


Exactly. -- And under Art. I, Sec. 10, this type of militarization of police forces could be seen as a keeping of troops in time of peace.

These people are playing with fire.