To: RGSpincich
The author assumes the lady was acquitted because she was not convicted. Wrong, there could very well be a hung jury here. The court docs on the PACER site have not been posted yet. The article here indicates that she was acquitted and that the jury thought the prosecutor had not been able to prove his case.
To: Dan Cooper
Yep, I found that one too...after I posted. Gotta quit doing that.
To: Dan Cooper
I would be FACINATED to know if the jury was fully informed as to a jury's right to overturn an unfair law?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson