Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: The Gubernator?
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 08/10/03 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 08/09/2003 5:43:47 PM PDT by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-180 next last

1 posted on 08/09/2003 5:43:47 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...

2 posted on 08/09/2003 5:44:39 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks for the ping. I'll read it after football. :-)
3 posted on 08/09/2003 5:49:38 PM PDT by secret garden (shaking sand from everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The best thing about Arnold is the frustration on the part of Dem newsmedia and voters that they dont have single candidate in any race-local or federal that generates this type of enthusiasm. We have Arnold and GWB. They have Algore and Dean.
4 posted on 08/09/2003 5:51:52 PM PDT by LongsforReagan (There are no Reagans today. We take what we can get!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
But he certainly has family ties to the Nazis. His wife's grandfather, Joe Kennedy, was one of America's most prominent Nazi sympathisers.

Ya just gotta love this guy!!

5 posted on 08/09/2003 5:53:11 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
BTTT
6 posted on 08/09/2003 5:53:41 PM PDT by knews_hound (Anyone else play Day of Defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
How does he do this? Mark Steyn is a genius. He writes so prolifically and each one is a gem...an absolute gem.
7 posted on 08/09/2003 5:59:39 PM PDT by vikingcelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
..the death-before-electability crowd..

Hehe..good line.

We've got a few FReepers that fit that category.

8 posted on 08/09/2003 6:01:08 PM PDT by evad (liberals & lying..It's WHAT they do, it's ALL they do and they WON'T stop...EVER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
..the death-before-electability crowd..

Heheheh.

Not gonna go there. Wouldn't be prudent.

Heheheh.

9 posted on 08/09/2003 6:07:06 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar; PhiKapMom; Hildy; rodeo-mamma
ping
10 posted on 08/09/2003 6:09:41 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; Sabertooth; Torie; AAABEST; Sir Gawain; ArneFufkin
Arnie wouldn't stand a chance of getting his watered-down "moderate Republicanism" past the death-before-electability crowd who dominate GOP primaries in California. He's unsound on almost everything that matters to them. On the other hand, that supposedly puts him closer to the average voter.

Yes, he's not a professional politician. And that's a disadvantage? The professional politicians are the ones who got California into this mess. This is a "throw the bum out" election, so the successful challenger will be the one who looks least like the bum.

Arnold represents the other California: entrepreneurial energy, wit and invention, the California that understands that if Hollywood and Silicon Valley were run by "qualified" people like Davis we'd still be watching flickering silents and you'd need union-approved quill-feathers to send e-mail.

Ever since he became a US citizen in 1983, Arnold has taken care, in his marriage and business interests, to remain politically viable. This is his window of opportunity: he's the man who seems most in tune with the moment.

Hehe, wonderful! It feels really good that someone like Mark Steyn agrees with me.

11 posted on 08/09/2003 6:11:07 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
" Is it likely that Californians have got themselves all whipped up with the Recall Fever just to install another rent-a-hack like Lieutenant-Governor Cruz Bustamante? Or will they figure, what the hell, let's go all the way and take a flyer on Arnie? "

---

I hope people will think it through and realize that any Republican/Independent/Libertarian/"very conservative Republican" etc. who votes for anyone other than Arnold is actually voting for Bustamante.

Visions of Perot voters who gave us Clinton, because they were voting for their "ideology"?
12 posted on 08/09/2003 6:12:21 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

13 posted on 08/09/2003 6:13:13 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
OR ...


14 posted on 08/09/2003 6:13:51 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Not gonna go there. Wouldn't be prudent.

Yeah..yer probably right.

Bye the way, great insights on the vanity "What's Really Behind the Episcopal Controversy".

There's little doubt in my mind that the weakest link is the Episcopal church.

My apologies for getting off topic on this thread.

15 posted on 08/09/2003 6:16:55 PM PDT by evad (liberals & lying..It's WHAT they do, it's ALL they do and they WON'T stop...EVER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
You just gotta love Steyn, especially when he correctly dissects one of the fundamental flaw in the RINOs:

Yet you don't have to be anti-abortion or unenthusiastic about gay marriage to question the hardness of Arnold's ass. When candidates run as "fiscally conservative but socially liberal", the former invariably buckles under the attendant costs of the latter. Arnold is married to Maria Shriver - a niece of Jack, Bobby and Ted Kennedy, and a daughter of George McGovern's running mate - and, as in many mixed marriages, the Democrat seems to have the upper hand ideologically.

I suspect that the Republicans who routinely cave to the RAT spouses because they, being fiscally prudent, have calculated that their politics is not worth the cost of divorce...whereas for RATS, they'll go for broke every time. After all, in their mental universe, the government will bail them out.

16 posted on 08/09/2003 6:18:22 PM PDT by Paul Ross (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!-A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder
bttt ...
17 posted on 08/09/2003 6:21:23 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

California Insider

A Weblog by Sacramento Bee Columnist Daniel Weintraub

« "What happens if Gray resigns?" | | Meanwhile... »
August 09, 2003

A campaign like no other

The recall campaign now underway will really be several campaigns in one. They will each operate in their own spheres but will also overlap with each other at times. Following it all, and analyzing it, will be extremely tricky. If it’s a close race, I think the polls toward the end will be worthless. We have never been to this place before. The experts can’t rely on the past to predict the future, this time.

One of the campaigns will be about Gray Davis. Should he stay or should he go? Davis is the underdog in that race. A majority of the state’s voters think he is doing a bad job and the state is going down the wrong track. But that campaign won’t be conducted in isolation. As we consider his fate, we will be thinking about question two: if Davis goes, who should replace him? The governor had wanted this question to give people pause. But now, as the field shapes up, we know that there are plenty of candidates on the ballot who we could plausibly imagine serving as governor. This hurts Davis, because he risks being forgotten as we rush to examine the shiny new alternatives in the political shop window.

But the “race to replace” will be conducted on at least two different levels as well. One is within traditional political circles, the consultants, pundits, and analysts for whom politics is job one. This is the realm where most of the candidates – Garamendi, Simon, McClintock, Ueberroth – will be operating. But there will be another campaign, on television entertainment shows, on college campuses, in movie lines and elsewhere, in which one candidate – Arnold – will be trying to reach and motivate the 7.6 million California voters who are registered but did not vote in the last election. If Arnold can get just one out of seven of them, or 1 million people, to vote this time, for him, those new voters would probably provide the margin he would need to win.

Arnold has a huge advantage with these voters. He has universal name recognition and the ability to reach them with an attractive message: we need an outsider to “clean up the mess” in Sacramento. These are people who cared enough to register to vote but did not vote last time. Most of them probably feel disconnected from their government. Arnold gives them a chance to plug in. And they give him a chance to turn the tables on the traditional political process.

Wealthy candidates have not fared well in California. And Davis and the Democrats have tried to paint the recall as tainted by millionaires seeking to buy a public office. But Arnold isn’t going to sit back and take that punishment. He has gone on the offensive, using his wealth to his advantage. He has enough money, he has said several times, so that he doesn’t have to take campaign contributions from the interest groups buying influence in Sacramento. He will make decisions “for the people.” We can debate forever how he will know what “the people” want or need, and whether “special interest groups” aren’t simply collections of like-minded “people.” But Arnold’s got a powerful line and a brilliant strategy for minimizing the wealth issue or even making it work for him. Especially with those voters turned off by the connection between money and politics, who think that every politician is in the pocket of the big contributors.

The other thing about these voters is that, being casual observers of politics, they probably care less about the nitty-gritty policy details than do regular voters. This plays into Arnold’s other strength. He can appeal to them not with policy white papers but with calls for new leadership, shaking things up, bringing people together. He can run as the outsider. The Democrats already are telling us that Arnold has only voted occasionally. This can be a liability in a traditional campaign. It makes the candidate seem irresponsible. But watch for Arnold to turn this one around as well. I predict he will not apologize for his infrequent voting but try to use it to his advantage. “I have rarely voted because the candidates have all been terrible,” he will say. “They have all been the same. Professional politicians who didn’t connect with me, didn't speak to me.” Thus he becomes the voice of the occasional voter, their poster child. He gives them cover for their own lack of participation and a reason to change that now. It wasn't their fault they failed to vote. It was the politicians' fault. Now we can punish those pols for their sins.

Only one other candidate, Cruz Bustamante, has much chance of reaching new voters, of expanding the base. He would be the first Latino governor in modern times. California has about 2.5 million Latino voters. But exit polls suggest that only between one-fourth and one-third of them voted in the last election. If Cruz connects with them, is adopted by them, becomes their hope and aspiration, he could generate significant new turn-out and benefit from it. And his campaign for those votes will be largely unseen and, perhaps, undetected by the mainstream media, and by pollsters. Like Arnold’s attempt to reach disaffected voters, we may not know if Cruz’s campaign is working until Election Day.

Despite the record number of candidates, I would not be surprised if this became a two-man race. Arnold v. Cruz. The immigrant against the son of immigrants. Both of them are going to be doing everything they can to expand the number of people paying attention to politics and participating in it. Combine that with the more traditional, between-the-lines game to be played by most of the other candidates, plus the work of mavericks like commentator Arianna Huffington, and you have the chance for a huge voter turnout, perhaps greater than last year, perhaps greater than any recent election for governor.

And I thought the recall was supposed to be anti-democratic.
Posted by dweintraub at August 9, 2003 08:20 AM



Copyright © The Sacramento Bee / ver. 4

18 posted on 08/09/2003 6:23:33 PM PDT by Not gonna take it anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore
Love Mark Steyn and was pleasenatly surprised by this weblog by Weintraub. I don't know if the liberal Sac Bee ran this in the print edition, tho I somehow doubt it.
19 posted on 08/09/2003 6:27:17 PM PDT by Not gonna take it anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Perot didn't give us Clinton; Bush gave us Perot.
20 posted on 08/09/2003 6:30:47 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-180 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson