Skip to comments.
California State Supreme justices squelch anti-recall lawsuits
Sacramento Bee ^
| 08/08/03
| Claire Cooper
Posted on 08/08/2003 7:44:31 AM PDT by bedolido
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:54:38 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
In fact it required that to vote on the second part of the ballot you must vote on the First part (To recall current office holder or to keep him) .
The court also ruled you do not have to vote on the first question to vote for a replacement candidate. I believe this is the only part of the recall procedures that was not upheld.
21
posted on
08/09/2003 6:10:56 PM PDT
by
breakem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson