Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: najida
Rape is rape....

Of course, but false accusations are still false accusations.

In cases where there are no witnesses, inconclusive physical evidence, and plausible allegations of consensual sex, how do you propose to determine which side is telling the truth. In those instances the case comes down to a credibility battle and the relevant history of both parties that bears on their credibility will be brought into play. There is no other way.

98 posted on 08/06/2003 10:02:25 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: PBRSTREETGANG
The jury hears the evidence-usually including testimony from the victim and defendent- and decides who they believe. Men have been found guilty in he said/she said sexual assaults. Of course, they have been found innocent too. No one knows what a jury will do.
104 posted on 08/06/2003 10:15:16 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
I understand what you are saying,

Personally, I know of three rapes that were never reported for that very reason.

"Who would believe me with my history?"

Scary in a sense...because it supports the premise that you can get away with rape if you pick the right victim and assure there are no witnesses.
113 posted on 08/06/2003 10:38:28 AM PDT by najida (What handbasket? And where did you say we were going?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson