[justshe]

"...but in this case, none have stood up against abuse of woomen...."

What case? We have an allegation of a crime. We have a person indicted (which is not a finding of guilt) and we have the alleged victim.

We have an accusation of rape vs. a denial accompanied with a statement of consenual sex.

Exactly WHAT is there to stand up against at this point?

Without a finding of guilt by a court of law, what you ask them to do is speak out against an unproven accusation. To damn the accused without basis?

Isn't that EXACTLY what you are doing....damning players in the NBA without basis?

[af_vet_1981]

What case? We have an allegation of a crime. (Murder of Laci Peterson and her unborn child) We have a person indicted (which is not a finding of guilt)(Scott Peterson) and we have the alleged victim (Laci Peterson and her unborn child).

We have an accusation of rape vs. a denial accompanied with a statement of consenual sex. (What man ever confesses that he has raped or murdered a woman ? They all lie through their teeth with their defenders. If we are fortunate we convict them.)

Exactly WHAT is there to stand up against at this point? (The William Jefferson Clinton defense)

Without a finding of guilt by a court of law, what you ask them to do is speak out against an unproven accusation. To damn the accused without basis? (Scott Peterson on line 2 could use your pro bono help)

Isn't that EXACTLY what you are doing....damning players in the NBA without basis? (Actually if they are damned it is of their own volition and there is certainly a sufficient basis)