To: sinkspur
But he is concerned with face time. If he wasn't, he'd have closed the hearing. If he doesn't regularly close these hearings, why close it now? Again, you guys are showing your bias by assuming that the judge just wants facetime. There's no way to know that. If you could get statistics that show how this judge regularly runs his courtroom and can show that he is deviating from his norm, then you may have something, but otherwise you guys are again accusing on no evidence.
This hearing was a nothing.
If I were accused of rape, it wouldn't be a nothing to me. Maybe the judge takes his job seriously unlike some big-city judges.
390 posted on
08/06/2003 4:04:01 PM PDT by
#3Fan
To: #3Fan
Could be that the judge is having the hearings on camera so there will be no doubt as to what is being done and said in the courtroom. No rumors if it's all live on camera.
391 posted on
08/06/2003 4:05:46 PM PDT by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(There are 2 types of people in this world: those who like Neil Diamond and those who don't.)
To: #3Fan
If he doesn't regularly close these hearings, why close it now? Again, you guys are showing your bias by assuming that the judge just wants facetime. There's no way to know that. If you could get statistics that show how this judge regularly runs his courtroom and can show that he is deviating from his norm, then you may have something, but otherwise you guys are again accusing on no evidence. I'll give you long odds it has never even come up before. Eagle County is a small community, and they probably don't have much serious crime, and even less where the defendant is a celeb. If that's correct, the judge may never have had to face this issue before, and wanted to see if the media would behave responsibly and follow the rules. So far as I could tell, they did.
444 posted on
08/06/2003 7:43:10 PM PDT by
Brandon
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson