[SJackson]

If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

[Cacophonous]

Are the Democrats Anti-Religion?

No, they are anti-Christian. They are all for benevolent, benign, nebulous "spirituality" though.

[zchip]

I have observed that the Democrats by and large are very supportive of the "religion-of-peace." They are decidedly anti-christian however.

[Tribune7]

bump

[Bosco]

The Democrats are very religious. They regularly worship all sorts of things: abortion, government dollars, power, government programs, THEMSELVES, money, you-name-the-special-interest rights, trees, endangered species, Castro.

I could go on but I think I've made my point.

[Fzob]

I suspect that most reporters, editors, and producers would be shocked by these findings. They really do think of themselves as, to pinch a phrase, "fair and balanced."

I don't think they would be shocked at all. To the media elite, religious traditionalists are news because they think they are not a mainstream eleement of society. On the other hand a story about the impact of secularist in politics is equilavlent to a dog bite man story. Being secular is normal to them, why report on something so boring and normal.

[pabianice]

Does a Kennedy pass-out in a bar?

[rhema]

Besides their "religion of peace" affinity (see post #4), Democrats are enthusiastic supporters of the First Existential Church of the Warm Fuzzy, the archbishop of which is the Ex-President Who Thinks With His Glands.

Churches that have the temerity to use terms like sin aren't big on Democrat lists. The name of Jesus, when used in any way other than an expletive, elicits immediate flop sweat in most Democrats.

[ChadGore]

[bluebunny]

Yes, I believe so.

[Consort]

I thought that most Catholics and Jews vote Democrat. What's going on?

[wingnuts'nbolts]

Socialism is their religion. Liberalism is the epression of their religion. Liberalism is relativism and Christianity and Judiamism are at odds with the left's political religion. Political religions are evil. Communism comes to mind before the Palistinians invented themselves.

The mystery is why they seem to like Islam, because they too are in the Jihadists sights. There is no safety there for the Dems, just more cannon fodder to the Muslim Extremists. Not too bad an idea. Does Hillary think for one moment that somewhere along the line Arafat and his Frenchified wife would not have slit her throat, sat on her stomach and eaten breakfast? Silly girl.

[johniegrad]

Good post. Thanks.

[stinkypew]

Atheists logically must reject moral absolutes. Christ is just as dead as Hitler. No ultimate justice/no sin; and they may be right. Who knows.

But tell some atheist environmentalist that she logically must admit that it is merely her subjective judgment that it is "wrong" to burn that tree or make it into a desk.

Most of the idiots have no idea of the inherent contradictions in their belief systems. Dostoyevsky wrote that "Without God, all is permissible." The secular left wants to impose their own moral absolutes while rejecting the only possible basis for absolutes. Idiots.

[Woahhs]

You should find this interesting:

The Godless PartyMedia Bias & Blindness--And the Big Story They Missed

[solo gringo]

You have to ask if they are the anti christian THE ANSWER IS YES.

[Lancey Howard]

Between the godless left (Democrats) and the religious right (Republicans), I'll take the religious right every time.

[reed_inthe_wind]

Send a bible to your local newspaper, television newsroom and radio stations. Remind the news directors and managers that Jesus warns us that his Father will deny those who deny him. Ask your local news directors if a copy of the Koran is displayed in their newsroom.

[JustPiper]

I just found this in my email, catching up. Here are the latest results, this needs to be bumped, pinged for votes:

Total: 1146 How much does your religion determine whom you vote for? Completely 21% Mostly 21% Somewhat 24% Not at all 34%

Vote Here

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

The moral relativists moral axiom is that there are no moral axioms, which of course is its own refutation. :)