Since you seem to require a double-standard, if the people who run this site want to maintain one for you, far be it from me to interfere. Carry on. #140
If you believe what you stated above, why haven't you dropped this as an issue?
If your intent is to "notify as many as possible" that you disagree with the decision and hence cast aspersions on the poster involved, you will continue with your posts re: this issue, no?
If it is your intent to change the decision of the owner of this forum re: his decision, why not address your concerns directly to Jim Robinson?
What, exactly, IS your intent by continuing to raise this issue?
What, exactly, IS your intent by continuing to raise this issue?
Don't try to play this on me.
I raised no issue here, and you're fully aware of that. I've responded to issues raised by others, such as I'll do with you now.
From your #264, on this thread...
Should one draw the conclusion that since the person being "questioned" is still posting, that JR has MADE the decision and this 'side-issue' should be dropped?
If it's acceptable to interpret silences as answers, how shall we interpret your silence as to the question of posters who violate posting guidelines established by Free Republic's management, and gloat about it in the forum?
Does your silence in this regard indicate you approve of gloating over the violation of posting guidelines?
What is your purpose in avoiding this question?
In other words, Darkdork is our ally, so let's forget about the rules--er, guidelines.
