2. I hate to break the news to you, but we will be more socialistic in 2004 than we were in 2000. Who gets the blame for that?
You didn't break news to me; you supported my statement. You agreed with me. The socialistic policy of 2004 is happeninng, in part, because a Socialistic Democrat was elected in '92 and reelected in '96. That sent a message to politicians that socialistsic policy can win elections. Who gets the blame, you ask? As I stated above, the blame, goes to the people who voted for Clinton, and Conservatives who abandoned Bush, among others. It was the Loose Coalition of Fools that I mentioned.
We've become more socialist because a Republican House, Senate and White House have passed and signed socialistic bills. Nothing more.
By your logic the 92 and 96 elections led politicians to believe socialist policy wins elections, but apparently 2000 did not endorse conservative policy in the exact same way. That makes little sense.