Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George F. Will:President Bush has turned conservatism on its head, infuriating many supporters
The Union Leader, Manchester, NH ^ | July 24, 2003 | George F. Will

Posted on 07/24/2003 4:00:40 AM PDT by RJCogburn

Edited on 07/24/2003 4:39:12 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

THIS IS THE is the summer of conservatives? discontent. Conservatism has been disoriented by events in the last several weeks. Cumulatively, foreign and domestic developments constitute an identity crisis of conservatism, which is being recast ? and perhaps rendered incoherent.

George W. Bush may be the most conservative person to serve as President since Calvin Coolidge. Yet his Presidency is coinciding with, and is in some instances initiating or ratifying, developments disconcerting to four factions within conservatism. The faction that focuses on foreign policy has four core principles: Preserve U.S. sovereignty and freedom of action by marginalizing the United Nations. Reserve military interventions for reasons of U.S. national security, not altruism. Avoid peacekeeping operations that compromise the military?s war-fighting proficiencies. Beware of the political hubris inherent in the intensely unconservative project of ?nation-building.?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrine; conservatism; georgefwill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-348 next last
To: Area51
An estimated 400 BILLION dollar cost to the kids.

Nice, real nice.

Sheeeeeet, next thing you know they will expect the kids to pay their damned car insurance to...Because well, they are the largest voting block alive and they deserve it.

Answer from some here: Great, perhaps we can take care of your monthly cable fees too!
201 posted on 07/24/2003 8:52:08 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Sorry, not going to happen. They will fail on the 16 words, too--Bush's real concern on the foreign policy end is his failure to plan for post-war Iraq.

O'Connor will never be a rallying point for anyone, nor the topic of a Democratic political ad. Anger at her is a much better issue with no negative political consequences, and it would resonate with people, because most people are against racial preferences and sodomy.

Bush doesn't even have to single her out personally--just criticize the court's decisions as "contrary to common sense," "destructive of government by the people" and "contrary to self-rule."

202 posted on 07/24/2003 8:52:49 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
You say potato, I say potahto. I didn't vote for an 18% increase in discretionary nondefense spending, and I'm not inclined to re-elect a candidate who gave me one.

I have no problem with that.

203 posted on 07/24/2003 8:54:30 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Consort
You did the right thing. Never apologize for doing the right thing.

200 posted on 07/24/2003 8:51 AM PDT by Consort

----------------

Why thank you, I don't. And that is exactly why I am taking Dubya to the woodshed. He had either get his act together and represent the Right, who put him in office or he can start making plans come January 05.

204 posted on 07/24/2003 8:55:34 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Area51
And before you rant on now this. Medicare Perscription drug Coverage RAPES my childs financal future. And NO ONE ask them whether they wanted to pay for 50 years for a benefit their Rich Uncle gets. Hell no! Just stick it to em. YOu ought to be proud to support such Fascism.

The price we pay for our form of gov't. Either these trade offs or a dictator. The good with the bad.

Something I notice about folks who stamp their feet and cry like you are doing is they never see that all of life is trade-offs. It really is an immature view of life.

205 posted on 07/24/2003 8:57:32 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Last post directed at you was a bit harsh.
I'll ratchet it down a tad.

Sorry.

(dragging out inflamed voter excuse card)
206 posted on 07/24/2003 8:58:25 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Something I notice about folks who stamp their feet and cry like you are doing is they never see that all of life is trade-offs. It really is an immature view of life.

205 posted on 07/24/2003 8:57 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right) --------------------------

I don't call a redistribution of weath a trade off. More like sticking the bill to a group of Americans that can't speak (politically) for themselves that will affect the kind of live they are able to live.

Damned sorry excuse for being Mature if you ask me.

207 posted on 07/24/2003 9:01:22 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights were designed to prevent that sort of "either-or" scenario. Of course that assumes that such documents are adhered to inthe first place :<
208 posted on 07/24/2003 9:02:32 AM PDT by KantianBurke (The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Area51
He had either get his act together and represent the Right, who put him in office or he can start making plans come January 05.

That's the Conservative Death Wish mentality that lost the White House for us. Bush 41 should have been reelected whether he liked it or not. With several possible Supreme Court vacancies coming up, we can not let the Dems control the nominating/approval process. So, electing the GOP nominee is very important, even if it's Bush.

209 posted on 07/24/2003 9:07:11 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Do Republicans really support smaller government? Here are some interesting facts:

WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS & POLITICAL BOONDOGGLES


210 posted on 07/24/2003 9:11:29 AM PDT by Sir Gawain (Why was Sabertooth banned?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
In the meanwhile, I think that we actually help Bush's chances by making things as hot as possible for him, on his increasingly severe deviations from traditional American values. The only chance he may have, is if we scare him into moving in our direction, and it is essential that that move be sooner, rather than later.

I am amazed at the number of people on conservative website who consider that statement to be heresy. In the name of pragmatism they will loudly denounce any attempts to pressure the Administration to move to the right as enabling a Democratic victory.

Holding the present course does not reverse the slide to the left. The vector has changed slightly in magnitude, not one whit in direction. Ultimately, who is behind the wheel or the steepness of the arc as you're going over the cliff is immaterial.

211 posted on 07/24/2003 9:17:01 AM PDT by LTCJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Ouch, now That is gonna leave a mark.
212 posted on 07/24/2003 9:17:03 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Yes, since the welfare state is completely unconstitutional, George Will is basically saying that violating the Constitution isn't inherently unconservative.

That seems pretty obvious, from viewing the actions of the vast majority of conservative politicians. But it's surprising to see a conservative proclaim a complete abandonment of an ideal.
213 posted on 07/24/2003 9:19:10 AM PDT by Mark Bahner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mark Bahner
Yes, since the welfare state is completely unconstitutional, George Will is basically saying that violating the Constitution isn't inherently unconservative.

I agree on both points. BTW, I am launching a study into the creation of the welfare state in America. I would appreciate anyone posting here or FreepMailing me some sources.

My goal is to create an essay on the precise moment when we jumped the shark. I suspect it was when FDR expanded the Supreme Court to nine justices so that his new appointees could outvote those Constitutionalists: the Four Horsemen who slapped down the first attempts to institute the New Deal.

214 posted on 07/24/2003 9:28:25 AM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Excellent list thank you for posting it
215 posted on 07/24/2003 9:35:31 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: billbears
There are still a few FR posters left that want limited government and that are not the right's equivalent of the Clinton Kool Aid drinkers.
216 posted on 07/24/2003 9:40:53 AM PDT by Sir Gawain (Why was Sabertooth banned?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

Comment #217 Removed by Moderator

To: hoi-polloi
No no no no

That really is a warm rain you feel on the back of your neck. :)

Trust em.
218 posted on 07/24/2003 10:00:08 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: hoi-polloi
No no no no

That really is a warm rain you feel on the back of your neck. :)

Trust em.
219 posted on 07/24/2003 10:03:30 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

Comment #220 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-348 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson