Posted on 07/15/2003 11:16:01 AM PDT by Polycarp
Is that something that bothers you dear? Do you dislike social conservatives?
"The researchers report a high rate of battering within the context of intimate homosexual partnerships, with 39% of those studied reporting at least one type of battering by a partner over the last five years."
--The American Journal of Public Health (December 2002, Vol. 92, No. 12)
"Homosexual activists David Island and Patrick Letellier -- both of San Francisco and co-editors of the National Gay and Lesbian Domestic Violence Network Newsletter -- write in their book, Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them, that domestic violence is a primary health problem for individuals involved in homosexual behavior ranking behind only AIDS for males, cancer for females, and drug abuse for both."
"Island and Letellier write: "The probability of violence occurring in a gay couple is mathematically double the probability of that in a heterosexual couple...we believe as many as 650,000 gay men may be victims of domestic violence each year in the United States." (Page 14)"
--American Family Association of Michigan
breakem appears to refer to himself as gay here.
Not really. If you're going to justfy and compare your pet perversion to a normal man woman relationship expect to justify it for others...if you can't or won't it just reveals your hypocritically flawed political philosophy.
You failed to clarify and answer my questions
Ummm...as much as you'd like me to "clarify" your own questions for you it would be nearly immpossible to know what's in the mind of someone who hasn't the capacity to understand their own feckless arguments. As far as answering your question, try asking one...I'd know it if you used one of those question mark "thingys" at the end of your sentenece.
and then you keep repeating the same question from thread to thread after I responded. I consider that stalking and it's clearly a violation of the rules.
and then, and then...(Sound of sniveling) I'm flattered but you are in a long line of Liberaltarians who show up on the sodomy threads comparing perversion to a normal man woman relationship, if you or the rest of your ilk keep making the same ludicrous comparisons so will I. Now either get a pair and justufy your silly hypocritical position, ignore me or stop whining when your logic falls apart. Either way stop sending me threats to my private mail and stop flattering your self that I'm "stalking" you.
I_Love_My_Husband called breakem a Liberaltarian and breakem freepmailed her back saying I asked you to stop the name calling.
BWAHAHAHAAAA....breakem thinks a political statement is name calling?
BWAHAHAHAAAA....stop it...my side is hurting...I can't take it any more...
Is that right breakem? Are you just another GLAAD subversive trying to justify perversion on FreeRepublic? That explains a lot. No wonder you're so "sensitive".
I agree.
It's worth noting that the author of that bill is small-l libertarian Marilyn Musgrave.
Please see my post #55.
That probably makes you a hypocrite.
Like so many of your questions Clint the question about my sexual preference has been answered. In fact I know I made references in replies to you that answered the question. You can try to remember or keep playing Sherlock Holmes.
Since you took so much time to recap our exchanges because you seem to think you are onto something, let's hear the rest of the story.
I have said that adults have a right to have sex with other adults as long as they are not forced. The absence of force is the essence of a free decision.
I also said that you cannot enter into a mutual contract with children or animals because they cannot legally consent. About the only other position I took was that the constitution does not claim as a purpose to name all human rights. and I have given numerous other examples of human rights which are not in the constitution and which the government cannot take away.
You have stated that you can have sex with your blow-up doll and pets because they are all your property. I stated that my standard was consent and that property cannot consent.
About two weeks ago you made some off-the-wall remark about my position on the 10th amendment. Your remark made no sense to me and I asked you several times to clarify it. You have ridiculed me and chased me from thread to thread since then repeating your question about kids and animals. I have asked you to stop and you continue only to ridicule.
You asked me to explain the difference between having sex with inanimate property and pets. The question is very ignorant in my opinion and I will not address it. I have told you this half a dozen times. If you continue it, I'll ask the administrator to stop you.
If you want to engage me in a dialogue, you will address me respectfully or I will report you. I will not tolerate stalking. If you have something civil to ask or add do so, I've been here amost 5 years and I don't run, but I also don't tolerate stalking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.