1 posted on
07/13/2003 8:34:12 PM PDT by
hsmomx3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: hsmomx3
"McCarthyism never has referred to anti-communism. McCarthyism means making reckless accusations and public smears without real evidence." There THEY go again.....redefining things to meet their needs.....LOL....with their definition, then, I guess you'd have to call the NEW YORK Times, McCarthyism.
2 posted on
07/13/2003 8:39:34 PM PDT by
goodnesswins
(Become a monthly donor.....it's easy....it's so simple, it's elementary....am I getting redundant?)
To: hsmomx3
My policy when it comes to Coulter is "no comment."
3 posted on
07/13/2003 8:40:00 PM PDT by
Torie
To: All
4 posted on
07/13/2003 8:41:21 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: fporretto; DPB101; americanSoul; Map Kernow; jjm2111; Scenic Sounds; ClearCase_guy
Coulter PING!
5 posted on
07/13/2003 8:46:13 PM PDT by
TheDon
(Why do liberals always side with the enemies of the US?)
To: hsmomx3
there has never been a dispute that McCarthy was absolutly correct in his accusations of communists.
They were commies and they were pegged.
The left would not be so vocal if it was a marsha clark or elenor roservelt INEFFECTIVLY fighting commies.
The revisionism was done by the hollyweird and the commies themselves.
Given the socialist and commies STILL infesting the state department, McCarthy is still right.
To: hsmomx3
What fool wrote this article?
If McCarthy had five brothers,
one who fought against pornography,
one who fought against the murder-babies-for-money-industry,
one who fought against big government,
one who fought for our absolute right to bear arms,
and one to fight for more true and factual and unrelenting press coverage...
America wouldn't be such a disgusting land of amnesiac, fat, lazy, dumb, sissified sheeple.
To: hsmomx3
Just a regurgitation of the liberal propaganda about McCarthy. They definitely didn't read the book.
9 posted on
07/13/2003 8:49:10 PM PDT by
TheDon
(Why do liberals always side with the enemies of the US?)
To: hsmomx3
Apparently these writers have never heard of the Venona Project. Joe was 100% correct. To bad he became an alcoholic.
10 posted on
07/13/2003 8:50:01 PM PDT by
blam
To: hsmomx3
They can't deal with the fact that McCarthy was correct. They had to engage in character assassination to draw the focus off of what the senator was saying. They did a similar thing to Goldwater and then Nixon. It is their stock in trade.
12 posted on
07/13/2003 8:51:59 PM PDT by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: hsmomx3
13 posted on
07/13/2003 8:52:16 PM PDT by
blam
To: hsmomx3
McCarthy, J. Edgar Hoover, Richard Nixon and others I haven't read the book but when I've seen her discuss it, she mentions five names. So why mention those three while referring to the fourth and fifth as "others?" Why not just use their names, Whittaker Chambers and Ronald Reagn?
McCarthyism means making reckless accusations and public smears without real evidence.
Like what the left did to Chambers? Like how the left still covers up for Hiss despite Verona?
McCarthy was right. Thank you, Ann.
15 posted on
07/13/2003 8:56:35 PM PDT by
Tribune7
To: hsmomx3
"There have been several genuine war heroes in the U.S. Senate." What does that have to do with being a pro-communist force in this country or helping and promoting Communist spies in this country?
More than one person caught up in a war has fought well, but later after the war has turned against his country - John F Kerry comes to mind.
16 posted on
07/13/2003 8:56:45 PM PDT by
sd-joe
To: hsmomx3
The KGB's release of secret files published in the Venona Files proves essentially what Ann reports in TREASON. She backs up all facts with 46 pages of notes. The leftists are going to have a hard time disproving her facts.
17 posted on
07/13/2003 8:58:30 PM PDT by
pattis
To: hsmomx3
There were plenty of implacable anti-communists among Democrats of the era: Scoop Jackson, Hubert Humphrey and , to name three contemporaries. That would be the same John Kennedy who defended McCarthy, and whose brother Robert made Tailgunner Joe godfather to his kid.
McCarthyism never has referred to anti-communism. McCarthyism means making reckless accusations and public smears without real evidence.
Precisely what Ann debunks, and the writer of this editorial engages in.
18 posted on
07/13/2003 8:59:10 PM PDT by
Hugin
To: hsmomx3
McCarthyism never has referred to anti-communism. McCarthyism means making reckless accusations and public smears without real evidence. I don't read the Republic, so maybe an AZ resident can inform me -- has the paper made any editorial condemnations about President Bush's "deception" in his State of The Union speech?
22 posted on
07/13/2003 9:07:08 PM PDT by
L.N. Smithee
(Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
To: hsmomx3
Evidently, there are STILL commies sprinkled liberally throughout this country. (Many of the neopats
* spring to mind.)
*Neopats: short for neopatriots...the new breed of patriots that define true patriotism as rabidly criticizing Bush.
To: hsmomx3
Regardless of how one regards Joe McCarthy, American officialdom is yet crawling with communists.
30 posted on
07/13/2003 9:22:08 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: hsmomx3
Again, they hate the book, they hate Ann Coulter, they hate Joseph McCarthy, but they don't counter the fact that the government was infested with soviet spies and sympathizers who were security risks and that the Democratic Party stood at the forefront of aiding, abetting, and defending them.
31 posted on
07/13/2003 9:23:07 PM PDT by
Spiff
(Liberalism is a mental illness - a precursor disease to terminal Socialism.)
To: hsmomx3
to AZ Republic Editorial Staff:
TRAITORS!
To: hsmomx3
What a lame article. Hell, it isn't even an article. Or a rebuttal. Just some loser saying she's lying.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson