Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave S
As it pertains to 'W', this is a non-story. It was a non-story when Tony Blair defended it. It became even less of a story when Tenet took the hit.

Rush is right when he says that America does not accept the rantings of liberals, ABCCBSNBCNNNNYT, etc. They have nothing to make the case, we have info that clearly refutes it. Let 'em rant and saw off the limb they're sitting on. It will be a beautiful thing.

61 posted on 07/13/2003 7:55:45 AM PDT by chiller (could be wrong, but doubt it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: chiller
Let 'em rant and saw off the limb they're sitting on. It will be a beautiful thing.

The only danger here is that this story is getting way more attention than it deserves. It is growing to the point where sawing off the limb might be very difficult, or it might hurt some good people when it falls.

This week with Stephanopoulos just started here. The intro contained a whopper of a falsehood. Something about "the controversy of how untrue information got into the state of the union address continues."

There was nothing untrue in the State of the Union address.

71 posted on 07/13/2003 8:04:03 AM PDT by cc2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: chiller
It was a non-story when Tony Blair defended it.

The latest tack by the leftist British press is to portray the Blair/Straw statements standing by their intelligence as a "rift" between the UK and the US.

How absurd. It was plain as day that they were stepping up to support us.

117 posted on 07/13/2003 8:33:06 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: chiller
As it pertains to 'W', this is a non-story. It was a non-story when Tony Blair defended it. It became even less of a story when Tenet took the hit.

I dont think its that much of a story either. However, if W were to follow the advice of those "clintonesque" Freepers that say it was proper to include the claim in the State of Union because the Brits say it was accurate, then he is going to dig a hole for himself. W has already said the statement shouldnt have been in the State of the Union as has Tenet. Why is everyone choosing to refight that battle?

141 posted on 07/13/2003 8:56:27 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson