Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
My point is Bush is not selling Conservatism, he is selling whatever you send me with a name the public likes on it bill and I'll sign it no matter what it means for the future.

Bush said he wanted strict constructionist judges, but he won't recess appoint Estrada, Pickering, or lady from TEXAS . How many Constructionist has he actually appointed?

The sodomy ruling involved Texas Law and he said nothing. Doesn't now support Constitutional Amendment regarding Marriage, and said SCOTUS rediculous Racial Preferences Ruling was good.

IS THIS WHAT YOU EXPECTED WHEN YOU VOTED FOR BUSH, we should be much better off than we are, the DemRATS for all their bitching are getting there agenda passed.
6 posted on 07/08/2003 8:58:48 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: TheEaglehasLanded
The sodomy ruling involved Texas Law and he said nothing.

Bush ain't on the Supreme Court. His opinion on their decisions carries the same weight as yours or mine.

I learned a long time ago, you don't pay attention to what people say, you pay attention to what they do.

I think Bush is playing rope-a-dope with the Dims. My litmus test is the AWB renewal.

If the AWB sunsets, then Bush got me what I wanted. He can say anything he wants, as long as the final result is what I want.

But then there are the people who are addicted to losing who want Bush to "take a principled stand."

What they mean is, they don't care about the result, they just want Bush to mouth words they want to hear like their Mommies used to.

7 posted on 07/08/2003 9:26:07 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson