[Jumper]

When the actual facts of the book are disputed and shown to be false I will be swayed by these writings, however, her last book was demonized by the Left/Press and stood the test of documented history on Ann's side. To make the book seem less legimite, the author grabs a sound bite from and interview!

[governsleastgovernsbest]

You argue that Horowitz's goal is "to make the book seem less legitimate."

But as pointed out at the top of his column, Horowitz has been a big fan of Coulter, even running her column on his web page. He is a bold and courageous conservative.

So he certainly has no axe to grind, no reason to distort the facts in order to delegitamize Coulter.

I'd say this column was definitely written "more in sorrow than in anger."

[jazzlite]

Ann Coulter: He was not as strong a president as a Republican would have been. But I’m referring, as I say again, I’m referring to a party that is functionally treasonable….

What is with Horowitz, anyway? Ann draws fire because she is refreshingly blunt and direct. She doesn't play around with trying to be nice to those who are the enemies of freedom here at home. Her message, in my view, is to describe what the Democratic party has currently evolved to. Is it not wonderful that this very georgous, razor sharp, fearless, highly intelligent, richly successful mouthpiece is a conservative woman? She is only doing what David, himself, has so successfully done which is to shine a bright light on all that liberal sleaze which has been so injurious to our culture. Ann, YOU GO, GIRL!! Maybe you will be President someday.