Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thorondir
So because we have no absolute definitive reading on the exact # of nukes and ICBMs they have you jump to the naive conclusion that they don't have ANY? Brilliant thinking...LOL. It's estimated they have enough strategic nukes to blow us to smithereens --- exact #s don't mean squat. Amazing, you just can't admit that you're wrong. Sick, actually. China has nukes, and they've had them for a while now. The information in that link (of the American Federation of Scientists) says as much. Deal with it, or don't.
122 posted on 07/04/2003 11:25:26 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Mojo
...you jump to the naive conclusion that they don't have ANY?

In a word, "no". But one must wonder where you pulled that wild-eyed leap of illogic from.

The information in that link (of the American Federation of Scientists)

Ha, ha, haaaaaa! I love it. Let's all depend upon the sky-is-falling crowd, misquote them and struggle to defend the most outrageously erroneous post ever written. Oh, man! My side hurts!
124 posted on 07/04/2003 11:30:42 PM PDT by Thorondir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson