To: PJ-Comix
This is fantastic news. Dean is a candidate in the mold of Mondale, Dukakis, and McGovern. His nomination would send the dems to electoral hell for at least four years. The only person who would make a better nominee is Sharpton. Hey, we could have the best of both worlds. How about a Dean/Sharpton ticket?
To: Former Proud Canadian
I was going to vote for Sharpton in the MO primary b/c we can vote for any candidate, but it looks like Dean may get my vote 9 months from now.
3 posted on
07/01/2003 4:36:02 AM PDT by
KC_Conspirator
(Let me tell you something, Johnson!)
To: Former Proud Canadian
You forgot a BIG one - DEAN *** is **** GORE - without the charm.
To: Former Proud Canadian
We are looking at a repeat of the McGovern fiasco. I was a democrat back in those days and I remember how the campuses were absolutely positive that McGovern would beat Nixon. Of course, no one ever talked to anyone outside the campus, and I remember how stunned my friends were with the Nixon landslide.
The left cannot face the fact that most of the country is not in tune with their thinking. They like Dean because he says what they want him to say, which is why he is getting all this money. They are convinced that if his message gets out, they will win.
Dean is articulate, granted. But he is also belligerent, arrogant, and flat-out nasty. He will be a nasty campaigner as well, even against other democrats. HA!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson