Oh, that's your argument? The court didn't change the form of government. If you are gong to use that argument, then maybe you should point to the first instance the SCOTUS knocked down a State law, and I guarantee you, it was much longer than 30 years ago.
OH?
Your belief that the meaning of the Constitution can be changed without changing the form of government is new and abhorent to me.
Of course the belief that the Constitution can be changed without amendment is a very popular one. Everyone thinks they will get what they want.