Skip to comments.
Howard Dean Wins 2004 Internet Presidential PAC Primary (43.87% of the vote-Kerry is 3rd!)
Press Release /Conference Call ABC News ^
| June 27, 2003
| Stan Greenberg Pollster
Posted on 06/27/2003 9:16:10 AM PDT by ewing
Not the 50% required for the millions in endorsement resources, but a stong showing none the less..
DEAN 139,360 43.87%
KUCINICH 76,000 23.93%
KERRY 49973 15.73%
EDWARDS 10146 3.19%
GEPHARDT 7755 2.44%
LIEBERMAN 6095 1.92%
SHARPTON 1677 0.53%
OTHER [GRAHAM, MOSELEY BRAUN, BIDEN, CLARK] 6121 1.93%
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2004; campaign; election; electionpresident; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
To: ewing
Dean and Kucinich(D-MARS) garnered over 67% of the vote ---- BWaaaaHaaaHaaa
41
posted on
06/27/2003 12:36:49 PM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Soddom has left the bunker.)
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
Kucinich is a Democrat, always was...Well, the Natural Law Party website promotes him. He's an ideological soulmate of the Natural Law kooks. I think that party should tag him whereever he goes, if people knew how insane those types were then they'd REALLY dislike that so called adult.
Comment #43 Removed by Moderator
To: ItsOurTimeNow
Am I the only one who's slightly uneasy about Dean's increasing populartiy? Yes. Have you seen this guy? No way he can win more than 5 states. He's a joke.
44
posted on
06/27/2003 1:07:46 PM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(I barbeque with Sweet Baby Ray's)
To: ewing
I see the racist Dims threw out all the Sharpton votes from anyone who wasn't a party regular. Nice try guys, you won't have that luxery when the REAL primary comes around and the GOP gets revenge in those "McCain" states.
We know you racist Dims HATE the idea of black people having any position of power in your party (and ALWAYS have!) but we're gonna make you RESPECT your black powerbrokers, one way or another.
45
posted on
06/27/2003 1:35:47 PM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(George Ryan deserves a long term...without parole.)
Comment #46 Removed by Moderator
Comment #47 Removed by Moderator
To: Latro
Dudes, we need to all give money to the Dean campaign and make sure he's the nominee! MurryMom cast her vote for Sen. Edwards in the MoveOn.com primary, but is ready to put up Dean signs all over Murrysville when and if Gov. Dean takes on the Smirking Chimp next November. It's one way to stop the permanent Bush Recession!
All contributions to the Dean and/or Edwards campaigns are sincerely appreciated. Thanks for your efforts on our behalf!
48
posted on
06/28/2003 5:52:09 AM PDT
by
MurryMom
Ya know, Dean may seem "unelectable" to you...
But he's getting people who didn't even vote last time interested. And a good chunk of those people have decided to vote for ANY dem in 2004, because they want to see Bush out.
If Bush lost the popular vote last time, and now he's energizing more Dems to get going, that doesn't bode well for him.
And of course, if Dean does win (which is more possible than you'd all like to think), wouldn't that make all your attempt to "freep" the campaign look pretty foolish?
Perosnally, I'd love to see a Dean commecial that says "Paid for by the crew at freerepublic.com". That'd be fun. You guys could be like all the guys that voted for Nader.
49
posted on
06/28/2003 6:59:17 AM PDT
by
joef
(-JoeF)
Comment #50 Removed by Moderator
To: joef
And of course, if Dean does win (which is more possible than you'd all like to think), I'm curious--why do you think so? It's still fairly early in the large scheme of things
I agree with you about stuffing ballot boxes, by the way, straw poll or no straw poll.
To: MurryMom
I wonder if Dean would have done as great a job at helping Osama bin Laden maintain his freedom?
52
posted on
06/28/2003 10:00:41 PM PDT
by
AlGone2001
(If liberals must lie to advance their agenda, why is liberalism good for me?)
To: AlGone2001
I wonder if Dean would have done as great a job at helping Osama bin Laden maintain his freedom? LOL! Every time the name of OBL is mentioned it reminds me of the monumental incompetence, arrogance, and duplicity of the Smirking Chimp Administration. When is the last time the Smirking Chimp even mentioned OBL's name in a press conference or otherwise?
53
posted on
06/29/2003 12:22:21 PM PDT
by
MurryMom
To: MurryMom
I recount things that are on the public record, and like a baby, all you can do is call names. The media simply refuses to encounter the truth, as they aid and abet him. You ought to take a look at yourself. It's truly embarrassing.
54
posted on
06/29/2003 7:31:22 PM PDT
by
AlGone2001
(If liberals must lie to advance their agenda, why is liberalism good for me?)
To: MurryMom
I don't know why you post on this board. You insult the president with child like name calling. I guess it must be hard for you to understand the tremendous pressure Bush is under. What's more important to you? America to win the war on terror, or Bush to lose in 2004? If Gore had won, and Osama was still on the run, would you have some equally childlike nickname for Gore? Or would you be saying how complicated an issue terrorism is, and if Gore can't figure it out, than I guess it's just too hard...How do even know Osama hasn't been dead for over a year?????
Do you even think about what you write before you post it?
55
posted on
06/29/2003 7:44:36 PM PDT
by
votelife
(FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
Comment #56 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson