To: chichipow
You do. There is no "scandal" here, as the headline writers try to point out. There were tech problems with getting the Predator to carry a huge explosive warhead.
Jesus, the people at AP are whores for the Rats!
Be Seeing You,
Chris
3 posted on
06/24/2003 7:47:19 PM PDT by
section9
(Major Motoko Kusanagi has returned! Tanned, rested, and ready.....)
To: section9
Q: What's new?
A: Not this story.
I hate summer reruns.
5 posted on
06/24/2003 7:50:24 PM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
To: section9
You do. There is no "scandal" here, as the headline writers try to point out.
I agree. It seems the Bush Admin was well on it's way to using the platform, but you know that Bush haters will use this as 'evidence' of complicity rather than a report chronicaling how close we were to pinching this guy before 9/11.
7 posted on
06/24/2003 7:55:45 PM PDT by
chichipow
To: section9
Yep, relevant points for when the Dems start yelping about Bush letting Bin Laden get away:
1) Bill Clinton decided not to act and put off using the drones(not taking action, passing the buck)
2) Bush was planning on how to attack Bin Laden Sept. 4, 2001(being proactive)
To: section9
Can't wait to hear slick willy reference this hit piece.....
64 posted on
06/25/2003 10:31:59 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(Insanity is my only means of relaxation.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson