[Quix]

VERY STRONGLY AGREE.

THANKS MUCH.

Wish this article could be tatooed on the forehead of every demoCRUD.

[The Brush]

That man cared nothing for this country.
I can't put words to the disgust I feel for him and the people who shield him from his crimes. I hope I live to see the day when people say "enough is enough" and his secret service protection is limited to the small cell where he spends the rest of his days.

[Libloather]

...Clinton's cooperation with Beijing's intelligence operations were so extensive that it could be decided in the interest of saving the presidential office to suppress evidence that might directly incriminate Clinton and some of his associates.

Libdem/Chicoms disagree? (You folks have been awfully silent lately...)

[MJY1288]

I don't want to sound like a tinfoiler, but I have often wondered why THIS SPEECH by Senator Inhofe on the senate floor was drowned out by the Lewinsky scandal????/

Here we have our nuclear secrets going off to China and the media is focused on zippergate. Was this by design?

[patricia]

Thanks for the great post.
I used to read Peter Zhang's articles when he wrote for THE NEW AUSTRALIAN. Tried to find him ... to no avail ... so THANKS! again.

[McGavin999]

I don't really think Hillary stands a chance. The war on terror will not be over by 2008, although it will be well in hand. I don't think America will be ready to have a democrat in the WH for many years to come.

[Irish Eyes]

Great article, thanks for the post.

It is always wonderful to read someone who can see right through the clintons and is not afraid to tell it like it is.

[Mark17]

Sounds like Bill "Julius Rosenberg" Clinton. Which one did more damage to the country? Ya gotta love the guy. Not.

[PatriotBill]

And why didn't Kenneth Starr expose this treason instead of focusing on the Lewinsky affair?! He had the goods on Clinton and let him escape...we could have finished Lucifer off!!!

[Slyfox]

Clinton in the shadow of treason

[Rocky]

There is a story in the Bible which resonates here. Hezekiah, King of Israel, received some emissaries from Babylon and showed them all around his palace and Jerusalem. After they left, the prophet Isaiah came to him and asked who the people were (I think he probably already knew - everyone in Jerusalem must have known - but he wanted to hear what the king would say).

The king's response is telling: "They are from a distant land. They came from Babylon." In other words, don't worry yourself. These guys are hundreds of miles from us. No reason to be afraid.

Isaiah asks what they saw. The king admits that he showed them everything. "There is nothing among my treasures that I did not show them." (Does that sound familiar?)

Then Isaiah responded, "The time will surely come when everything in your palace, and all that your fathers have stored up until this day, will be carried off to Babylon."

And this happened about a hundred years later. Unfortunately, Hezekiah didn't live to see the result of his misjudgement. And the Clintons may not either. But there is no question that they have damaged this country severely.

[nutmeg]

bump

[Ronin]

Very true, and something that we all need to remember.

It looks like he has gotten away with it all. But I still cherish the hope that someday... somehow... Clinton will pay for his crimes.

[Just mythoughts]

While bjclinton held the title of President, what cannot be left out of the picture is that we were told from the beginning of their reign that we got two for the price of one.

bjclinton was the bait, the image, the voice and face of the reign of clintons, however it was Hillary who ran the show.

Hillary's attempt to paint bjclinton as being set-up by a "VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY" sums up her role as co-president.

These two had a world wide network of the communist/socialist fellow traverlers already established from their reign in Arkansas, and bjclinton's Euro days pretending to be in college.

These two never gave a wit about what was in the best interest of this nation, they were so drunk and obsessed with the power they had conned Americans into giving them, the first and foremost goal was maintaining that power.

China buying nuclear delivery methods, for campaign dollars, along with Indonesia money (Indonesia coal/Utah coal), were the source of campaign contributions so necessary to win in 1996. Nuclear arming of whom ever, where ever, when ever, was never an issue to this bunch, after all the stated policy was "EQUALIZE ALL NATIONS".

After all, that adoption of N. Korea, in 1994, that too many think was a China deal, came out of the fact that Russia, who could no longer afford the upkeep. Getting the US to pay for N. Korean upkeep and allowing nuclear status, as well as feeding them, served what purpose and for whom?

China did in fact benefit from the US adoption of N. Korea, kept hordes of starving N. Koreans from flooding into China, but it did far more than that. N. Korea became the drug runner of the Far East and slave labor became a source of producing military hardware that was too expensive and too easily to connect with Russia and China. (Russia under Stalin made a pact with China over N. Korea in 1950)

The past 100+ years have been a worldwide "VAST LEFT WING CONSPIRACY" of the believers of communism/socialism/liberalism to take away from this nation its standards, status, and blessings.

These two were given the opportunity to nail the final nails into their coffin, "FREEDOM", and too many of US citizens helped them almost accomplish the dreams of the anti-God, anti-freedom leftists of the world.

bjclinton could never have accomplished "TREASON" without the actions of his devoted little woman.

[dennisw]

bttttttttttttttt

[Right_in_Virginia]

BTTT!

[MeekOneGOP]

Clinton in the shadow of treason

Excerpt:

Observing the Clinton propaganda machine, even from this distance, I predicted that, using its media allies, it would launch a multi-pronged attack: 1. It would claim that most of the damage was done during previous administrations. 2. That most of spying occurred in nuclear facilities. 3. In any case, the loss of American military secrets to China represent only a marginal threat to national security. Again, I was right. What is more, none of these excuses can withstand an honest appraisal of the facts, which a quick examination will easily reveal.

Number one is simply not true. If it were, why was Chung given a top security clearance and access to the White House at the suggestion of Chinese officials? I made clear elsewhere that Beijing laid down conditions that gave it access to all of America's secrets. To fulfil this condition Clinton abolished Department of Energy internal controls that restricted access to sensitive facilities thus allowing Chinese intelligence operatives free reign.

In addition, and this is of critical importance, Clinton virtually abolished controls on exports to China of high-tech equipment that had important military applications. Moreover, to make it even easier to access this equipment and knowledge Clinton transferred responsibility for technology exports from defence to the Commerce Department. Why? Because this had the effect of removing these technologies classified status.

What is not classified cannot therefore be secret. This is the Clintons' devious legalistic logic at work. "How could I have sold secrets", he can now claim, "when they weren't secret?"

Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.

[hosepipe]

If true... Wheres Cox..? He should be crying treason..
Nah!...So many in Wash D.C. should be crying treason hes probably afraid.. Since even uttering the word Socialist is not chic'.. uttering the word TREASON could be as bad as saying Jelly instead of Polanar All Fruit(TV Coml)...

The scope and breadth of Clintons treasonous activitys goes far beyond Chinagate.... YET, the silence from YOUR (and my) REPRESENTATIVES.... is like a fart in a Nunnery... raised eyebrows and clucking but NO simple "WHO FARTED"..

And some say there is no shadow government....
Oh! well, maybe Ann Coulter's new book will break the logjam of cowards in Congress.... Course, could be, conservatives don't want to know, that would require doing something, like jeopardizing their political careers.. That would'nt do... after all who would then be there to protect from Congressional treason.... Oh!, did I just make complete logical circle... damn... Happy voting 2004....

Wonder if the fix is in for the Hildebeast ?..YET. Hmmm
Have a nice day, more or less...

[yoe]

"Americans are now confronted with the spectacle of Hillary Clinton cynically trying lay down the foundations for a presidential bid. This woman is far worse than her husband ever was. God help America, not to mention the rest of us, should she manage to fulfill her overriding ambition."

There is no doubt in my mind that treason was the reason that Monica took front the page for months and the Senate knew this so that spineless body did not vote to convict.

It is just because of articles like this the lefts voices are becoming louder and louder with baseless criticisms of President Bush as they continue to try to shout down their complicity in treason with the Clinton administration – they are all culpable. Hillary doesn’t want to lead America, she wants to rule America.

[AGreatPer]

Great article bump.