To: steve50
I guess if I am pinned down on it, I am as cynical as many about politicians. But I don't see what Bush would have gained by lying, knowing he would have to produce evidence once the war was over. Do you?
47 posted on
06/19/2003 8:08:32 AM PDT by
eyespysomething
(Breaking down the stereotypes of soccer moms everyday!)
To: eyespysomething
Dubya didn't lie, he hoped. He twisted dubious evidence expecting to find WMD once the troops went in.
To: eyespysomething
But I don't see what Bush would have gained by lying, knowing he would have to produce evidence once the war was over. Do you? There seems to be a lack of reason and common sense applied by some of these FReepers.
They don't want to think...they want the answers handed to them in perfect black and white text.
52 posted on
06/19/2003 8:21:15 AM PDT by
evad
(Lying..It's WHAT they do, it's ALL they do and they WON'T stop...EVER!!)
To: eyespysomething
I guess if I am pinned down on it, I am as cynical as many about politicians. But I don't see what Bush would have gained by lying, knowing he would have to produce evidence once the war was over. Do you?
I'm from the old school of investigation. As any cop worth his salt would say " follow the money". The gains are huge for certain factions, especially considering the call to "privitize" the oil resources.
So we now have Tenet, who appears to be the fall guy, if he doesn't find the WMD his and Rummys sources claimed were there. Bush has plausible deniability and conservatives can blame the old klintoon crony for misleading the administration if the CIA and it's inspectors can't "produce" the evidence.
53 posted on
06/19/2003 8:23:00 AM PDT by
steve50
(I don't know about being with "us", but I'm with the Constitution)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson