To: microgood
please note that, according to the EPA info posted above, this guy kept ignoring warnings and filled in the site, which then caused his neighbors' houses to flood. if any of us lived next to this guy, and he caused our houses to flood, we might not be so favorable towards him.
i think the first article (based on his daughter's testimony) may be somewhat misleading. and remember, a jury did convict him.
17 posted on
06/18/2003 9:08:27 PM PDT by
drhogan
To: drhogan
first of all, note "according to the EPA"...don't believe anything they say! Next, the wetlands are not natural, they were only caused to be there by the effect of thousands of tires, vehicles, etc. Now if the guys neighbor's property flooded, because this guy cleaned up the mess....that the town had created and allowed.....the neighbor needs to sue the township! Hell, would you like to live near and illegal dump? Besides, the man done the whole community a service cleaning up toxins to the whole community!
To: drhogan
Federal Agencies lie and federal juries are given the mushroom treatment. In any case, damage to his neighbor's homes (if any, see above) is a civil matter. So why is any of this within the Section 8 powers of the Federal Government?
28 posted on
06/19/2003 6:11:36 AM PDT by
Rifleman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson