Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kristol: Bush Made Misstatements on Iraq WMDs
Newsmax ^ | 06/08/03 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 06/09/2003 3:30:39 AM PDT by joesbucks

Sunday June 8, 2003; 12:56 p.m. EDT

Kristol: Bush Made Misstatements on Iraq WMDs

In comments sure to be seized upon by Bush administration critics at home and abroad, one of the leading proponents of the war in Iraq said Sunday that President Bush may have misstated the case that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction before the U.S. attacked.

"We shouldn't deny, those of us who were hawks, that there could have been misstatements made, I think in good faith," Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol told "Fox News Sunday."

Asked, by whom, the leading Iraq war backer explained, "By the president and the secretary of state, [statements] that will turn out to be erroneous."

Kristol stressed that he didn't believe charges from Bush administration critics that the president had deliberately distorted WMD intelligence.

But the leading neoconservative writer and former chief of staff to Vice President Dan Quayle added, "I hope [the WMDs] are found but I'm very skeptical.

"We have interrogated a lot of people and we haven't found a single person who said he participated in disposing, destroying the stock of weapons of mass destruction. Or in hiding them."

Kristol said that Saddam probably "did bluff a little bit" when it came to acknowledging he possessed WMDs in 1998, saying that "[U.S.] intelligence estimates were wrong, too."

"I don't think we need to be apologetic about the war," Kristol insisted. But he said the U.S.'s inability to uncover significant quantities of Iraqi WMDs means that the war may not have been as necessary and urgent as previously believed.

"People like me, who were hawks, said the war was both just, prudent and urgent," he said. "I think just and prudent - fine. But it is fair to say that if we don't find serious weapons of mass destruction capabilities, the case for urgency, which Bush and Blair certainly articulated, is going to be undercut to some degree."

Kristol, who made his comments just minutes after Secretary of State Colin Powell said on the same broadcast that there was no doubt Saddam had WMDs when the U.S. attacked, did acknowledge, however, "There has been evidence that they had an ongoing weapons of mass destruction program, I think, even if they did not have as large a stock of the weapons as we thought."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; distorted; iraq; kristol; misrepresent; overstate; wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 06/09/2003 3:30:39 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
"We have interrogated a lot of people and we haven't found a single person who said he participated in disposing, destroying the stock of weapons of mass destruction. Or in hiding them."

From what I have heard, those people also have failed multiple lie detector tests.

2 posted on 06/09/2003 3:41:38 AM PDT by LibertyThug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Headline - "Bush Made Misstatements on Iraq WMDs"

Quote - "there could have been misstatements made"

Big difference Carl. Or Carl's editor.

3 posted on 06/09/2003 3:43:51 AM PDT by Jaxter ("A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul."- Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyThug
From what I have heard, those people also have failed multiple lie detector tests.

Interesting. I wonder if the administration would submit to polygraph exams to answer whether their statements and the research gathered to support it was intentionally distorted.

4 posted on 06/09/2003 3:51:18 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Will you take one to see if you're a troll?
5 posted on 06/09/2003 3:57:51 AM PDT by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Interesting. I wonder if the administration would submit to polygraph exams to answer whether their statements and the research gathered to support it was intentionally distorted.

Considering there have been people in France, Germany, Britain, the UN, the US, and other countries who have all said Iraq possesed WMDs in the past few years, that would be a long line at the lie detector.

6 posted on 06/09/2003 4:01:22 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Interesting. I wonder if the administration would submit to polygraph exams to answer whether their statements and the research gathered to support it was intentionally distorted.

Listen, if they had intentionally distorted, as you seem to be intimating, why didn't they just go all the way and plant the WMD's to begin with?

7 posted on 06/09/2003 4:09:19 AM PDT by LibertyThug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibertyThug
"failed multiple lie detector tests"

That's what I heard too. The 'RATS will do any thing to make President Bush look bad. They don't care what kind of damage they cause. They don't give a darn about what is best for our country.

They want President Bush to be perceived as a liar so they can say that x42 wasn't that bad. They are trying to blur the HUGE and I mean HUGE contrast between the character, inherent decencey, and moral up-rightness, of President Bush, and the total lack of character, and morals, of x42.

The Republicans need to counter-act this though, Because the 'RATS live by "repeat a lie often enough and people will beleive its true".

If they want to find the WMD's maybe they should check the UN building in Belgium, or, how about France? They were handing out passports to Saddam's people, What else did they do? While the UN was stumbling ,stalling a faltering, Saddam had PLENTY of time to move and get rid of the stuff. It serves the UN's purposes to make President Bush look bad too. Read the tag line

8 posted on 06/09/2003 4:22:45 AM PDT by fly_so_free (Never underestimate the treachery of the demacratic party. Save the USA-Vote a demacrat out of offic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Don't miss the latest blather from Bill.
9 posted on 06/09/2003 4:25:26 AM PDT by mombonn (Have you prayed for our President yet today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyThug
"We have interrogated a lot of people and we haven't found a single person who said he participated in disposing, destroying the stock of weapons of mass destruction. Or in hiding them."

I think another interpretation is that it's possible that all those that helped were killed so they couldn't give the info...

10 posted on 06/09/2003 4:31:31 AM PDT by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
I'm glad you caught that too. In the headline, he says "Bush made misstatements...". That's not what Kristol said. He said "...may have made misstatements...". I hate it when people misquote and then go on to build a story about it. I heard Kristol yesterday and he is concerned about the issue but he was not as dogmatic about the idea as the article would lead you to believe.
11 posted on 06/09/2003 4:52:14 AM PDT by jatfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
This is his usual pattern. This is a duplicate of an article posted yesterday.

What I said then was that Kristol was pushing war with Iraq because he didn't think that Bush would do it, especially after he went to the UN. Bill still misreads the President.

Once we went in, he had no choice but to applaud, given the position he staked out. Now he sees his opportiunity to cause trouble and his usual pattern of behavior is resurfacing. He despises Bush, always has, always will. I don't think it is because he supported McCain. I think he supported McCain because he despises Bush.

12 posted on 06/09/2003 4:52:32 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
The only misstatement is Limbacher's. I saw the show yesterday; Kristol said it's possible the administration was wrong but that it doesn't change the overall calculation of whether war was appropriate.

Sadly, Newsmax blew an opportunity to make an impact, and can no longer be taken seriously.

13 posted on 06/09/2003 4:58:49 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mombonn; Miss Marple
Bill's quotes were used by these
presstitutes very selectively to
create the greatest havoc for the
Bush Administration.

That said, he knifed the good guys
in the back just to cover himself
for having been hawkish. Stupidly,
too, IMO. What does he say later,
as more truth comes out???

What a sorry excuse for a real man,
or even a journalist/commentator,
Kristol has(again) shown himself
to be!
14 posted on 06/09/2003 5:01:00 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Good reply, Marple.

When all is said and done, I would not be surprised if a young George W. and an even younger Bill Kristol had a bad run-in at the White House back in Bush I's administration. GW was dad's enforcer. Wouldn't be surprised if he confronted Bill about something embarrassing.

Bill is doing a bit of ass covering so he can maintain some sort of "independence" from Bush's administration. So, he jumps on the press bandwagon about the WMD. This should surprise no one.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

15 posted on 06/09/2003 5:01:31 AM PDT by section9 (Yes, she's back! Motoko Kusanagi....tanned, rested, and ready!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Very interesting. Now why is Newsmax, once again, trying to stir up dissension and controversy?
16 posted on 06/09/2003 5:02:37 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Was Habalja a flu epidemic?
17 posted on 06/09/2003 5:04:05 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: section9
I have a LOOONG theory of Kristol's trouble-making. I won't post it here, but whenever a Republican is suddenly taking a turn towards self-destruction, Mr. Kristol is usually lurking about, pulling strings.
18 posted on 06/09/2003 5:04:09 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
If I were to paraphrase Kristol's sentiments I would say he meant:

The administration may have made good faith errors - after all it's difficult to make predictions with 100% accuracy. But conservatives shouldn't get defensive about it, because it doesn't change the overall decision about the war.

I have no idea why Newsmax distorts as much as they do. I have a hard time taking anything they say seriously.

19 posted on 06/09/2003 5:08:37 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Krystol has access to the interogations? Krystol is a know it all with yellow teeth.
20 posted on 06/09/2003 5:10:39 AM PDT by smith288 (The government doesn't need to save me from myself. Im quite capable thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson