Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay employees say DOJ blocking 'pride' event
June 6, 2003 | www.cnn.com

Posted on 06/06/2003 3:52:28 PM PDT by No Dems 2004

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Gay and lesbian employees at the Justice Department said Friday that officials have told them they will not be permitted to hold a gay pride event later this month.

Justice Department spokesman Barbara Comstock declined to comment, saying that the issue is an "internal matter."

The president of DOJ Pride, a group of gay and lesbian Justice Department workers, said members are upset by the decision.

"We want this decision to be reversed. We simply want equal treatment with other employee association groups," said the group's president, Marina Colby.

Colby said she was informed May 31 that the event, set for June 18, could not go forward. She said she took part in a conference call this week with Justice Department officials in which she was told the group could not hold the event because Gay Pride Month, which is June, has not been recognized with a formal proclamation from President Bush.

She said her group would like to meet directly with someone from the attorney general's office to discuss the matter.

Greg Friel, another member of DOJ Pride, said the department is trying to send a message. "I think they are sending us a signal they want us to go back into the closet, quite frankly," Friel said.

Friel said that some conservative groups criticized the Justice Department for holding a gay pride event last year. Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson spoke at that event. Friel said there has been some form of commemoration of gay pride at the Justice Department yearly since 1997.

Gay Pride Month is not recognized uniformly across government agencies. The Environmental Protection Agency held a gay pride event Wednesday. The State Department has one scheduled for later in the month.

However, a member of a gay employees organization at the Commerce Department said his group was informed last year that the department would no longer sponsor or participate in such events. He said gay employees can still use Commerce Department facilities for meetings.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: commercedept; doj; epa; homosexualagenda; statedept
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Well, this looks like some good news. It's about time the White House woke up and realised that homosexuals aren't their friends, and started figuring out who really is.

I hope this decision holds.

1 posted on 06/06/2003 3:52:28 PM PDT by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
Greg Friel, another member of DOJ Pride, said the department is trying to send a message. "I think they are sending us a signal they want us to go back into the closet, quite frankly," Friel said.

They need to make up their minds. Is it an issue for the privacy of one's own bedroom or an issue to be paraded at workplaces with pride?

2 posted on 06/06/2003 3:57:11 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
Sounds like John Ashcroft put his foot down on this one. I say it's high time other government agencies begin to follow suit and expose the whole Gay-rights fraud for what it really is, and how their lobbyists bully and demonize those who disagree with their 'lifestyle.'

-Regards, T.
3 posted on 06/06/2003 3:59:42 PM PDT by T Lady (.Freed From the Dimocratic Shackles since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
They need to make up their minds. Is it an issue for the privacy of one's own bedroom or an issue to be paraded at workplaces with pride?

There's an award-winning tagline in there somewhere. . .

4 posted on 06/06/2003 3:59:58 PM PDT by Ligeia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
Colby..."We simply want equal treatment with other employee association groups."

What does that include?????

5 posted on 06/06/2003 4:00:04 PM PDT by codder too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
I wonder if the DOJ would object to a Straight Pride event?
6 posted on 06/06/2003 4:00:59 PM PDT by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
Have never seen a HMEAINHWM day, week, or month held in any federal agency! (Heterosexual, Monogamous, European, Atlantic/Islander, Non-Hispanic, White, Males)
7 posted on 06/06/2003 4:05:43 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Freedom is not Free - Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Lady
"Sounds like John Ashcroft put his foot down on this one. I say it's high time other government agencies begin to follow suit and expose the whole Gay-rights fraud for what it really is, and how their lobbyists bully and demonize those who disagree with their 'lifestyle.'"

Agreed. There is absolutely nothing to be gained from the gay rights movement for the GOP. Most people aren't even interested in knowing what the weirdos are up to. Look at Senator Santorum - how many people cared when he compared homosexuality to bestiality and adultery? And, as we learned with Trent Lott, just one ill-advised remark can destroy a politician's career - or at least greatly hinder it. But Santorum was given a clean bill of health: Tom DeLay congratulated him 'for standing on principle'; and President Bush and Senator Frist praised him for the job he was doing, refusing to issue any reproof whatsoever.

The GOP needs to realise much more fully that being opposed to the homosexual agenda is the right thing to do, both morally and even politically.
8 posted on 06/06/2003 4:05:44 PM PDT by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
Exactly. Because, we're not special, you see . . . :)
9 posted on 06/06/2003 4:07:30 PM PDT by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: codder too
I'll tell you what that includes. Not letting their opponents get a word in edgewise, or allowing anyone to disagree with the way they conduct themselves, that's what. In other words, they name streets after people like Colby and other lobbyists-One Way.

-Regards, T.
10 posted on 06/06/2003 4:07:31 PM PDT by T Lady (.Freed From the Dimocratic Shackles since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
What about the Straight Pride events?

Homosexuals like to get up and whine that they don't want to be defined by they sexual preferences, then go out of their way to say "look at me, I'm a homosexual," and throw it up in everone's faces.

11 posted on 06/06/2003 4:11:06 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
Gay and lesbian employees at the Justice Department said Friday that officials have told them they will not be permitted to hold a gay pride event later this month.

These pukes need to get over this stupid idea that their LIVES are defined by their sexual orientation.

12 posted on 06/06/2003 4:11:56 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
I wonder if the DOJ would object to a Straight Pride event?

For sure. DOJ should strive for an image (and reality) of impartiality, and that would be harmed by having employees who can't let their politicized activities, even good ones, wait until after work.

13 posted on 06/06/2003 4:11:59 PM PDT by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
We simply want equal treatment with other employee association groups.

The only problem is, there shouldn't be any employee association groups at the Justice Department, gay, straight, or whatever. It is a tax-funded government institution.

If you want to form a special group with your fellow government employees, you need to have your events outside of the workplace. Americans don't pay you to feel pride in your lifestyle or ethnic heritage.

14 posted on 06/06/2003 4:12:51 PM PDT by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
"I think they are sending us a signal they want us to go back into the closet, quite frankly," Friel said.

Sounds like a good idea.

15 posted on 06/06/2003 4:14:51 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
I can't imagine most employers rushing to allow their employees to celebrate their sexual preferences on company time, let alone a preference that is an abomination to the prevailing morality.
16 posted on 06/06/2003 4:15:17 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
I'm with you 100% on that one!

-Regards, T.
17 posted on 06/06/2003 4:17:39 PM PDT by T Lady (.Freed From the Dimocratic Shackles since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
Good. I hope they stand firm.

I've yet to see how homosexual acts of fellatio, anal sex, fisting or cunnilingus qualify as something to be "proud" of.

This is nothing more than another whiney, b!tch group trying to "get one over on the straights" and intimidate the "breeders". That's all it is.

Homosexuality is not an issue of identity it's an issue of behavior which is why it is almost universally reviled.

18 posted on 06/06/2003 4:20:09 PM PDT by Im Your Huckleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Lady
You've got it. Thought perhaps there was a "straight pride parade" on the schedule that we missed.
19 posted on 06/06/2003 4:34:57 PM PDT by codder too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
"Gay Pride Month is not recognized uniformly across government agencies"

Trying to make homos a national holiday! Good grief! The world has been turned upside down. Go back into the closet perverts!
20 posted on 06/06/2003 4:35:47 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson