To: Guillermo
Wrong. Not when I could be charged with trespassing because I missed a sign.
Texas has had these signs up for years and I never heard anyone complain like the anti-gun libs have been doing in Minnesota.
8 posted on
06/06/2003 2:23:28 PM PDT by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Shooter 2.5
I never heard anyone complain like the anti-gun libs have been doing in Minnesota.
The hysteria among the people that lean toward political brainlessness has been truly breathtaking. I think the new law has caused most of the editorial staff at the Minneapolis Star and Tribune to swoon.
The law has been in effect for about eight days now, and I haven't seen a single stiff that we can attribute to its passage. For that matter I haven't seen a single stiff at all in the last eight days.
Seriously, I wonder how many days need to pass before a few of these fruit loops state that their fears might have just been a tiny bit overblown.
18 posted on
06/06/2003 2:45:00 PM PDT by
stevem
To: Shooter 2.5
So you agree that if the sign is in Times New Roman font instead of Arial, then the sign should be deemd non-compliant...
21 posted on
06/06/2003 2:49:19 PM PDT by
Guillermo
(Proud Infidel)
To: Shooter 2.5
I haven't heard any state whine about CCW as much as Minnesota...
To: Shooter 2.5
"Wrong. Not when I could be charged with trespassing because I missed a sign."
You aren't trespassing unless you refuse to leave when asked.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson