Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just another Joe
And what I couldn't do with 1/4 of the population as my steady customers.

But, this is the crux. We all know that smokers can (and do) go to resturants and not smoke while they are inside. You can still smoke, just not there. Like the 7-11's in some states. In some states, it's illegal to consume alcohol on the premises. You can drink, just not there.

30 posted on 06/06/2003 10:38:27 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Hodar
We all know that smokers can (and do) go to resturants and not smoke while they are inside.

That's not the crux of the matter.
My beef is that the govt, of ANY type, is imposing laws on private property owners, banning a legal action, without a shred of proof that the action will harm the people that go to that business.
If the owner of a business wants to ban smoking on the property I have no problem with that. It's their property
For the govt to do it, against the wishes of the owner, with no proof of harm, is just wrong. It's Big Daddy Govt telling it's children, "Don't do it because I SAID don't do it."

33 posted on 06/06/2003 10:47:30 AM PDT by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson