Skip to comments.
Banned missile programme found in Iraq
The Associated Press ^
| 6/4/03
Posted on 06/03/2003 10:51:48 PM PDT by LdSentinal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: LdSentinal
However, Whitehall sources told The Times: "What we need to find is firm evidence of a chemical weapons programme, because much emphasis was placed on the chemical threat. We need to discover why Saddam did not use chemical weapons against coalition forces."Whatever is found, the Rats will have an "however" rejoinder.
Missiles are one delivery system for WMD. A WMD threat is even more ominous when those weapons can be shot out at people in neighboring countries.
To: Tommyjo
Al Samoud was a moot point as the Iraqi's had already stated that if war was inevitable it would stop it's destruction programme.It was only a moot point in that we already knew and Saddam had already admitted that he possessed them. But he admitted that long after the deadline had passed for him to disclose or face severe consequences. Also, he was using them to try to string us along, destroying a very small number at a time. So it was not a moot point as far as justification for the war goes.
22
posted on
06/04/2003 5:00:39 AM PDT
by
alnick
("Never have so many been so wrong about so much." - Rummy)
To: Salvation
So how will the lamestream media spin this?The missles were designed purely for peaceful purposes such as launching communication sattelites to support the baby formula factories.
23
posted on
06/04/2003 6:16:27 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(Standing tough under Stars and Stripes)
To: Otto von Bismark
A missile is a tool that can deliver WMD's but is not one in and of itself.
If Saddam had been able to build his atomic bomb one of the plans to use it involved putting it on a boat and detonating it in the port of Haifa.
By your logic a boat would then become a weapon of mass destruction. Pretty silly logic if you ask me.
To: LdSentinal
The left-wing Daily Mirror tabloid reported Wednesday that troops hunting for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction had searched 87 "prime sites" in Iraq, but found nothing. Read between the lines here folks. These 87 Prime sites were known before the war. Lets for a moment assume the intelligence was correct. Now why would all 87 prime sites come up clean ? Logically, the Iraq's were tipped off. There was a leak in intelligence.
Assuming there was a massive leak in intelligence and assuming your goal is to account for as much as possible of the exisiting stuff and further assume you can never be sure if you have searched everywhere, what information would you release regarding your ongoing investigation ?
25
posted on
06/04/2003 6:49:42 AM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: activationproducts
WMD= weapon + delivery system.
26
posted on
06/04/2003 6:51:11 AM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: LdSentinal
bump
More evidence the Iraqis were lying their asses off. Let's keep looking.
27
posted on
06/04/2003 6:55:11 AM PDT
by
finnman69
(!)
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: alnick
Lots of burning questions out there.Our intel and military knew where everything else was. Why the Hell did they miss one small detail like WMD? If WMD's were distroyed, why didn;t Saddam offer proof and save himself of an invasion?
30
posted on
06/04/2003 7:10:59 AM PDT
by
oyez
(Is this a great country or what?)
To: Salvation
and am I the only person who realizes that "prime locations" WON'T yield anything?
31
posted on
06/04/2003 7:15:46 AM PDT
by
The Wizard
(Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
To: FairOpinion
The UN found missiles that had been made wider than were allowed. The Al Saud missile could be made into a long range weapon by mounting a second rocket motor side by side. But to do so the origonal tube would have to be made wider. The sanctions froze the size, Sadam made the Al Saud II just wide enough to double mount the russian rocket motors. He also had a test stand built to test fire two rocket motors side by side, a further breaking of the treaty.
To: alnick
Also he was destroying the ones that were legal, not the double wide ones. At the same time his factorys were turning out new double wide ones and the ones being destroyed were missing the motors. Some useless motors from another missile model were stuffed in the tube to make it look like he was destroying good systems. But in fact his show and tell for the UN was just scrapping systems that could not fly anyway.
It was all a big joke, that the UN played along with...
To: Salvation
Note the immediate alteration of the goal when the finding of the threat was mentioned? Now it is not a finding that Iraq was indeed posing a threat - now it is "chemical weapons" and "why did he not use them".
I think we run in circles trying to answer the derogatory comments of the left. Maybe we should just ignore their constant harping and stay busy doing what has to be done.
34
posted on
06/04/2003 7:45:30 AM PDT
by
ClancyJ
To: VRWC_minion
WMD=weapon
To: activationproducts
It took Clinton's White House years to find the Rose Law firm billing records when they were allegedly in the WH. We can look at least that long for WMDs before questions are legitimately raised about their existence.
36
posted on
06/04/2003 8:43:25 AM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
To: activationproducts
No Delivery system = No Mass Destruction.
37
posted on
06/04/2003 8:50:47 AM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Mo1
The right of centre newspaper??? Wasn't that nice of AP? Wonder how many left-wing papers the wire service IDs? And how often..?
38
posted on
06/04/2003 8:53:04 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: LdSentinal
I read it took 7 years to capture all of the Japanese war criminals and establish a constitutional gov't in Japan after WWII. It certainly provides some perspective. I imagine we can do it a little faster now days though. Maybe 4 or 5 years? Time will tell.
39
posted on
06/04/2003 9:03:21 AM PDT
by
TheDon
( It is as difficult to provoke the United States as it is to survive its eventual and tardy response)
To: LdSentinal; HatSteel
Thanks for finding this and posting this. There is another new thread on Free Republic that ties right in with this thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/922957/posts?page=1 FAS (Fed Am Scientist) Report: Iraqi Precursor Chemicals Stored Separately for Weapon-side Mixing
FAS.org ^ | Federation of American Scientists
Posted on 06/04/2003 6:47 AM PDT by HatSteel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson