Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Banned missile programme found in Iraq
The Associated Press ^ | 6/4/03

Posted on 06/03/2003 10:51:48 PM PDT by LdSentinal

LONDON (AFP) - US and British experts have discovered that Iraq was developing a banned missile, capable of reaching Israel and other parts of the Middle East, the Times reported, quoting "senior government sources".

The right-of-centre newspaper said it understood British Prime Minister Tony Blair , who has called for patience in the search for Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, has been told that rocket motors for the missiles have been found.

Sources told the paper that in the past few weeks weapons experts discovered that the Abu Ghraib military base near Baghdad was developing a weapon with a range of about 960 kilometres (600 miles).

Under limits set by the UN Security Council, Iraq was allowed to missiles with a range of up to 150 kilometres only, The Times said.

Blair, under growing pressure over allegations his office exaggerated intelligence reports to make Saddam Hussein's regime appear more menacing, has hinted that further evidence of Baghdad's secret programme has begun to emerge but has yet to be made public.

However, Whitehall sources told The Times: "What we need to find is firm evidence of a chemical weapons programme, because much emphasis was placed on the chemical threat. We need to discover why Saddam did not use chemical weapons against coalition forces."

A powerful parliamentary committee decided late Tuesday to probe Blair's decision to go to war in Iraq, amid claims the government had embellished intelligence on weapons of mass destruction to justify the conflict.

The left-wing Daily Mirror tabloid reported Wednesday that troops hunting for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction had searched 87 "prime sites" in Iraq, but found nothing.

The paper, which opposed the US-led war, said that a 100-strong team of British military specialists would join a new American-led hunt for weapons evidence involving 1,400 personnel belonging to the Iraqi Survey Group after the apparent failure of the current search.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abughraib; banned; illegalweapons; iraq; iraqisurveygroup; missile; missiles; weaponsprogram; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: LdSentinal
However, Whitehall sources told The Times: "What we need to find is firm evidence of a chemical weapons programme, because much emphasis was placed on the chemical threat. We need to discover why Saddam did not use chemical weapons against coalition forces."

Whatever is found, the Rats will have an "however" rejoinder.

Missiles are one delivery system for WMD. A WMD threat is even more ominous when those weapons can be shot out at people in neighboring countries.

21 posted on 06/04/2003 2:38:07 AM PDT by fightinJAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tommyjo
Al Samoud was a moot point as the Iraqi's had already stated that if war was inevitable it would stop it's destruction programme.

It was only a moot point in that we already knew and Saddam had already admitted that he possessed them. But he admitted that long after the deadline had passed for him to disclose or face severe consequences. Also, he was using them to try to string us along, destroying a very small number at a time. So it was not a moot point as far as justification for the war goes.

22 posted on 06/04/2003 5:00:39 AM PDT by alnick ("Never have so many been so wrong about so much." - Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
So how will the lamestream media spin this?

The missles were designed purely for peaceful purposes such as launching communication sattelites to support the baby formula factories.

23 posted on 06/04/2003 6:16:27 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (Standing tough under Stars and Stripes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Otto von Bismark
A missile is a tool that can deliver WMD's but is not one in and of itself.

If Saddam had been able to build his atomic bomb one of the plans to use it involved putting it on a boat and detonating it in the port of Haifa.

By your logic a boat would then become a weapon of mass destruction. Pretty silly logic if you ask me.
24 posted on 06/04/2003 6:21:18 AM PDT by activationproducts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
The left-wing Daily Mirror tabloid reported Wednesday that troops hunting for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction had searched 87 "prime sites" in Iraq, but found nothing.

Read between the lines here folks. These 87 Prime sites were known before the war. Lets for a moment assume the intelligence was correct. Now why would all 87 prime sites come up clean ? Logically, the Iraq's were tipped off. There was a leak in intelligence.

Assuming there was a massive leak in intelligence and assuming your goal is to account for as much as possible of the exisiting stuff and further assume you can never be sure if you have searched everywhere, what information would you release regarding your ongoing investigation ?

25 posted on 06/04/2003 6:49:42 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: activationproducts
WMD= weapon + delivery system.
26 posted on 06/04/2003 6:51:11 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
bump

More evidence the Iraqis were lying their asses off. Let's keep looking.
27 posted on 06/04/2003 6:55:11 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: alnick
Lots of burning questions out there.Our intel and military knew where everything else was. Why the Hell did they miss one small detail like WMD? If WMD's were distroyed, why didn;t Saddam offer proof and save himself of an invasion?
30 posted on 06/04/2003 7:10:59 AM PDT by oyez (Is this a great country or what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
and am I the only person who realizes that "prime locations" WON'T yield anything?
31 posted on 06/04/2003 7:15:46 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The UN found missiles that had been made wider than were allowed. The Al Saud missile could be made into a long range weapon by mounting a second rocket motor side by side. But to do so the origonal tube would have to be made wider. The sanctions froze the size, Sadam made the Al Saud II just wide enough to double mount the russian rocket motors. He also had a test stand built to test fire two rocket motors side by side, a further breaking of the treaty.
32 posted on 06/04/2003 7:17:51 AM PDT by American in Israel (Right beats wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: alnick
Also he was destroying the ones that were legal, not the double wide ones. At the same time his factorys were turning out new double wide ones and the ones being destroyed were missing the motors. Some useless motors from another missile model were stuffed in the tube to make it look like he was destroying good systems. But in fact his show and tell for the UN was just scrapping systems that could not fly anyway.

It was all a big joke, that the UN played along with...

33 posted on 06/04/2003 7:20:49 AM PDT by American in Israel (Right beats wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Note the immediate alteration of the goal when the finding of the threat was mentioned? Now it is not a finding that Iraq was indeed posing a threat - now it is "chemical weapons" and "why did he not use them".

I think we run in circles trying to answer the derogatory comments of the left. Maybe we should just ignore their constant harping and stay busy doing what has to be done.
34 posted on 06/04/2003 7:45:30 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
WMD=weapon
35 posted on 06/04/2003 7:57:30 AM PDT by activationproducts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: activationproducts
It took Clinton's White House years to find the Rose Law firm billing records when they were allegedly in the WH. We can look at least that long for WMDs before questions are legitimately raised about their existence.
36 posted on 06/04/2003 8:43:25 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: activationproducts
No Delivery system = No Mass Destruction.
37 posted on 06/04/2003 8:50:47 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
The right of centre newspaper???

Wasn't that nice of AP? Wonder how many left-wing papers the wire service IDs? And how often..?

38 posted on 06/04/2003 8:53:04 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
I read it took 7 years to capture all of the Japanese war criminals and establish a constitutional gov't in Japan after WWII. It certainly provides some perspective. I imagine we can do it a little faster now days though. Maybe 4 or 5 years? Time will tell.
39 posted on 06/04/2003 9:03:21 AM PDT by TheDon ( It is as difficult to provoke the United States as it is to survive its eventual and tardy response)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal; HatSteel
Thanks for finding this and posting this. There is another new thread on Free Republic that ties right in with this thread.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/922957/posts?page=1

FAS (Fed Am Scientist) Report: Iraqi Precursor Chemicals Stored Separately for Weapon-side Mixing
FAS.org ^ | Federation of American Scientists


Posted on 06/04/2003 6:47 AM PDT by HatSteel
40 posted on 06/04/2003 9:12:59 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson