Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe Whitey
I bet there is absolutely nothing that would convince you that they the weapons had been destroyed rather than being "hidden", is there?

The point is, when the inspectors returned in 2002, Saddam immediately began playing his same old games, when it was imperative on him to completely cooperate with the process. This was not a trial in this country, where the defendent has the benefit of the doubt and the prosecutor must make the case - instead, under the terms of the 1991 cease fire and subsequent resolutions, Saddam had to destroy his chemical and bio weapons and concretely document the process. Instead, we got 12 years of games. Saddam could have destroyed the weapons - but when and how? He had to both destroy AND document instead of obstructing.

106 posted on 05/29/2003 11:47:55 AM PDT by dirtboy (someone kidnapped dirtboy and replaced him with an exact replica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson