Skip to comments.
The Idiot's Guide to Chinagate
RichardPoe.com ^
| May 26, 2003
| Richard Poe
Posted on 05/26/2003 9:43:13 AM PDT by Richard Poe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Richard Poe
Bump.
2
posted on
05/26/2003 9:44:44 AM PDT
by
Rocko
To: Richard Poe
Succinct and on target. Great post.
3
posted on
05/26/2003 9:53:34 AM PDT
by
LisaFab
(Free Miguel Estrada!)
To: Richard Poe; Alamo-Girl
Thanks for this greta post. China and the abject treasonous support given that regime by our own leaders is going to lead to very big trouble IMHO. I try and warn of it in my
Dragon's Fury Series Also, please check out Alamo-girl's ...
There is great info about Chinagate at the DSL too.
4
posted on
05/26/2003 9:55:42 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
To: Richard Poe
bump
To: Richard Poe
Perhaps the media have it all wrong, then. Maybe Bill Clinton was our first Chinese president, rather than the first black one.
6
posted on
05/26/2003 10:39:12 AM PDT
by
Major Matt Mason
(np Richard Thompson, "The Old Kit Bag")
To: Richard Poe
I am currently reading Bill Gertz's "The China Threat". As the quote from Gordon Liddy on the back cover states "...this will scare the hell out of you".
The Clintons should be tried for treason, period.
To: Richard Poe
It's only May, but this article gets my vote for the most important article of the year. This is both THE most important AND underreported story of the entire 20th Century. An American President sells out his own country for illegal campaign cash he wound up not being able to use!!! But because it lacks sex, brevity, and because it takes an above 75 IQ to understand,(and because it is about the leader of the Democrat party) the story was not given the attention it deserved.
The excuse making and buck passing and spin doctoring will continue, even after the first couple of cities on the West Coast are obliterated by Chinese missiles.
THank you Richard for the websites, and KEEP ON FREEPIN' ON!!!
To: Richard Poe; All
9
posted on
05/26/2003 10:58:27 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(A nuke for every Kook ( NK, Iraq, Iran, Pak, India... )- what a Clinton "legacy...")
To: Richard Poe
a boon to those of us who like to keep records. thanks.
10
posted on
05/26/2003 11:13:29 AM PDT
by
demosthenes the elder
(If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
To: Jeff Head
Thank you so much for the heads up and for linking to the DSL! Hugs!
To: Richard Poe
MEGA BUMP!!
To: Richard Poe
Two corrections. First, China probably doesn't have suitcase nukes. If they've achieved that level of miniaturization in bomb-making, their new ICBMs should be MIRVed with 6-8 warheads. To the best of my knowledge they're only able to mount 3 or 4 on an ICBM.
Second, it's ridiculous to say that before Clinton, China's missiles could "barely reach Taiwan". Their first limited-range ICBMs were operational by the mid-70s. The first full-range ICBM was tested in 1971, though it wasn't successfully tested until a decade later. However it is true that the accuracy (CEP) of their warheads and reliability of their rockets has improved exponentially in only the last decade.
To: Richard Poe
An excellent thumbnail sketch, Mr. Poe! Here's my question: In light of the gross and obvious treason that took place, why is it that the entire Republican establishment, George W. Bush included, has done absolutely nothing to either prosecute those involved or halt the sale of sensitive military technology to China? A report surfaced on Frontpage magazine last month that detailed the transfer of a munitions plant in Indiana responsible for the "smart bombs" used in Iraq to China - evidently with the full approval of Bush and the Republicans. While I sincerely hope that Bill Clinton is one day brought to face the tip of a needle for his treason, he is certainly not alone.
To: All
"Pantex" is the final assembly plant for nuclear weapons,and is located in the Texas Panhandle, near Amarillo, Texas. It is under contract from the government to a company called BWXT (Mason-Hanger, Silas Mason Co., Inc. used to be the contractor). A couple of years ago, I was listening to a talk radio program about the Chinese company Hutchison Whampoa and how it leases the Panama Canal. The female caller said that she had been told BWXT ALSO was owned by Hutchison Whampoa! Not a great thing, if true!
I have searched every way I know to prove or disprove this, and haven't been able to find much out. If anyone knows anything about this, I'd appreciate hearing it.
15
posted on
05/26/2003 2:20:26 PM PDT
by
Maria S
To: Filibuster_60
China probably doesn't have suitcase nukes.Good point, though this is disputable. The Chinese may consider miniaturization technology more vital for terrorist use than for MIRVing, in which case they might refrain from mounting more warheads on an ICBM, for now, in order to prevent us from discovering their capabilities.
...it's ridiculous to say that before Clinton, China's missiles could "barely reach Taiwan."
Thank you for the correction. You are right, of course. I have fixed the error in the other published versions of this column, on NewsMax.com and RichardPoe.com.
To: Richard Poe
Excellent post! bump'n'keep
17
posted on
05/26/2003 2:49:15 PM PDT
by
CGVet58
(I still miss my ex-wife... but my aim is improving!)
To: Mia T
Bump
To: Richard Poe
Corrected version...
When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, China presented little threat to the United States. Chinese missiles "couldnt hit the side of a barn," notes Timothy W. Maier of Insight magazine. Few could reach North America and those that made it would likely miss their targets.
To: Richard Poe
someday billy boy will pay for his treason........
20
posted on
05/26/2003 2:56:34 PM PDT
by
The Wizard
(Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson