To: cschroe
You are right- there are some criteria that still have to be met. I believe it is a 2 handicap or better? But those criteria were met.
My point is, that for these tournaments, there are those who do not have to qualify (due to past PGA success), those who do have to qualify, and those who get sponsor exemptions. All three are legitimate ways of earning the way into the tournament. Her spot today was legitimate, as long as there are going to be sponsor exemptions.
843 posted on
05/22/2003 11:39:47 AM PDT by
William McKinley
(Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
To: William McKinley
No one said her spot wasn't legitimate, the debate is whether she earned it like all the other "big boys" the media is so quick to point out that she can play with.
855 posted on
05/22/2003 11:44:45 AM PDT by
Bob J
(Freerepublic.net...where it's always a happening....)
To: William McKinley
If you're contention is that receiving a sponsor exemption is earning a spot, then there is no further need for debate. I disagree with the premise.
859 posted on
05/22/2003 11:45:51 AM PDT by
Bob J
(Freerepublic.net...where it's always a happening....)
To: William McKinley
I was not aware that she had a men's handicap. Could you please tell us what it is?
866 posted on
05/22/2003 11:49:26 AM PDT by
presidio9
(Homophobic and Proud!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson