Make a coherent point and I may stay around. Your remediation is tedious.
You cannot use the 10th amendment to say that the constitution was meant to deny human rights. Who gave the founders the right to deny sometheing they did not have the power to grant or and thus to deny?
You can repeat your question all you want, but you have a serious misunderstanding of governmental power vis a vis human rights. Please let me know if you ever decide to run for office.
Right and unenumerated simply protects those not covered in the 10th, if it doesn’t then it’s decided by the judiciary as in Griswold v. Connecticut. Madison’s intent was “by enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power, it would disparage those rights which were not placed in that enumeration.” It’s a simple concept even an eight year old can understand, it’s a right if there’s NO legislative prohibition.
Make a coherent point and I may stay around. Your remediation is tedious.
Show some sign of life beyond you ridiculous assertions and you’ll be able to see you’re wrong.
You cannot use the 10th amendment to say that the constitution was meant to deny human rights.
Why is incest not a “human right”? Oh that’s right you can’t answer that with any degree of logic can you?
Who gave the founders the right to deny sometheing they did not have the power to grant or and thus to deny?
That would be the constitution.
You can repeat your question all you want,
I’ll stop since you don’t have the capacity to answer them.