Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timesink
My own policy: avoid permanently.

MS has a lousy security record, and is basically too doggone big.
5 posted on 05/18/2003 5:08:34 AM PDT by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paul_B
My thought exactly. I am convinced M$FT resists implementing QC procedures. Probably because proper QC can delay a product's introduction.

"I know, I know. Just skip the rigorous QC for now. Give it quick once-over. We gotta get this thing out the door or there's gonna be hell to pay. Don't worry, we'll do the QC later and stick it in version x.1"

I'd bet a dollar statements like this are made around M$FT on a regular basis.

They do not, much to their detriment, realize that QC is not a "separate" process; rather it must parallel the development process from the beginning.
</end rant>

6 posted on 05/18/2003 9:42:04 AM PDT by upchuck (Contribute to "Republicans for Al Sharpton for President in 2004." Dial 1-800-SLAPTHADONKEY :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson