[A CA Guy]

a number greater that 1/20th of 1% as this department has. Only 4 out of 1900 went to the wrong address and only 1 out of 1900 ended up involving a person with a pre-existing heart condition and because of that pre-existing condition a death.
There is no proven case of excessive police use of force in this case.

It's ashame that some would desperately grasp to her rare situation a reason to bag all attempts to contain illegal drug activity of criminal bad people.

[WoofDog123]

"There is no proven case of excessive police use of force in this case. "

Is there a video recording of the entry/subduement of the subject?

Rational posters on this thread can bet this was THE shock of her life, presumably with police-ownership-only select-fire weaponry aimed at her head while she was handcuffed.

Posters should also view this " a ca guy" person as an example of why you shouldn't vest too much moral and legal power in your own government. Before you know it, you will have you own local brownshirts shoving bizarre deaths down the public throat as a cost of doing business over some narcotics, which at base production cost, should be dirt cheap.

[WoofDog123]

"a number greater that 1/20th of 1% as this department has. Only 4 out of 1900 went to the wrong address and only 1 out of 1900 ended up involving a person with a pre-existing heart condition and because of that pre-existing condition a death. "

What remedy/legal options would you recommend when a department exceeds your number? Slap on the wrist, or extra job-training, or pall-bearer duty?