Replies

"Well, if allowing people to act in private with others of like mind condemns me to eternal woe, then bring it on."

"PRIVATE" word now perverted to cover what is openly demanded. Legal status "civil right" for sex acts done with consent in private is the ultimate "lie".

The constitution does not offer "privacy" as a right, only man twisted need to "hide" their dirty little deeds got everyone on an emotional "feeling" demanding something not given.

I don't give a rat's behind what you do in private and if what is done in private is kept private then why in .ell is this a public issue.

Not only has perversion of Sodom become public, the perversion of our legal system is now what is at issue.

The little boys playing with each other, in Texas knew what the law was, so they broke the law, now in order to take that law down they demand the rest of us to feel bad that their "privacy" was broken and that "privacy" which they have no right to becomes the issue in demanding that their playing with each other become a "civil right".

No claim has been made that these two boys were targets because of the manner they choose to have sex.

A physical perversion now becomes twisted into the perversion of our legal system. Talk about hate, these twisted bunch try and intimidate the rest of us calling us bigots, by demanding that "we the people" give them status in the legal system making sodomy a "CIVIL RIGHT".

Your woe is just that your woe. Not talking about your personal choice.

"The constitution does not offer "privacy" as a right."

Is the Constitution a listing of all our rights?

Does the Constitution per say, give you the right to shelter, i.e. buy a home?

Does the Constitution grant you the right to self defense?

Does the Constitution "offer" you the right to raise your children as you see fit?

If the right to privacy is non-existent, why are the authorities required to get a Court order to wire tap you, or to open you mail?

If the right to privacy does not exist, then what's wrong with the Patriot Act?

If the right to privacy does not exist, then you would support the placement of mind hidden cameras in public restrooms, and retail store dressing rooms to monitor illegal activity, i.e. shoplifting or deviant sexual behavior?

"A physical perversion now becomes twisted into the perversion of our legal system."

Texas statutes define this perversion as being contact between one person's anal/oral cavities, and another person's genitalia.

But it makes it ckear that heterosexual contact, or rather, heterosexual "deviant sexual intercourse" is perfectly fine.

Do you agree with the Texas law?