Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP’s Lean Slate (Wash. st.)
Seattle Weekly ^ | May 7, 2003 | George Howland Jr.

Posted on 05/07/2003 11:06:00 AM PDT by JohnnyZ

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Reichert and Stanton sound OK. Hopefully they'll get to run against Gary Locke -- "another popular Democrat" my butt!
1 posted on 05/07/2003 11:06:01 AM PDT by JohnnyZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Well, I'm not impressed by the state party leader. ""What won't sell is harsh, in-your-face conservatism," says Vance. Yet, "It's not as simple as moving the party to the center. If I was trying to drive the pro-lifers out of the party, that would be divisive. Our [party] slogan is 'Working for All of Us.'"

I agree that harshness is foolish in a politician. It's better to be soft-spoken like Bush than loud and offensive like Newt Gingrich. (Yes, I agree with much of what Gingrich accomplished, but not with his self-destructive way of always shouting about it at the top of his voice.)

But is it harsh to be pro-life? I would have thought it was harsh to kill babies. We don't need more RINOs in congress, who will vote against tax cuts and in favor of tax-funded abortions.
2 posted on 05/07/2003 11:24:56 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Linda Smith could have ousted Murray if Mitch McConnell hadn't yanked financial support in the last month of the campaign. Something about Smith's outspoken support of term limits that tied McConnell's shorts in a knot
3 posted on 05/07/2003 11:25:53 AM PDT by dosadi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
That's what Vance said. "It's not as simple as moving the party toward the center." Basically he's advocating happy-face conservatism (or compassionate conservatism, or Bushatism, or whatever). He didn't say it was harsh to be pro-life, he said it was bad to be harsh and he wasn't going to drive out pro-lifers.

I would guess that they'd like pro-lifers to be generally less Bible-thumping, to make a pragmatic argument on the areas of widest agreement, and libertarian anti-taxers to make pragmatic arguments against the worst of the spending excesses instead of saying they'll repeal all taxes and services. Might as well play to your opponent's weakness rather than your own, even if you "weakness" is right and only "weak" 'cause it's controversial.

4 posted on 05/07/2003 11:34:36 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (That's my theory and I'm sticking to it! At least for the present . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
I don't know Stanton but I've heard Reichert speak at Republican conventions. He does have an excellent presence.
5 posted on 05/07/2003 11:35:16 AM PDT by Eala (irrelevant (î-rèl´e-vent) 1:The UN 2:France 3:CNN 4:Tim Robbins 5:Chretien 6:Doonesbury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
"I don't know that Patty Murray has been a strong person in advising our governor. Her vision is not as sharp as it should be, and her record of accomplishment is questionable."

This certainly takes the understatement of the year award! Sadly, there are few Republicans who worked at Microsoft and made fortunes that would let them buy an office.

6 posted on 05/07/2003 11:41:29 AM PDT by Maigret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Vance is incompetent, until you dump him the Republican Party will continue to lose.
7 posted on 05/07/2003 12:04:48 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
But is it harsh to be pro-life?

In Washington, it is. The state is strongly pro-choice. In 1998, there was an initiative on the ballot to ban partial birth abortions, and it lost by 2 to 1. It even lost in conservative eastern Washington.

8 posted on 05/07/2003 12:08:23 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
There hasn't been a Republican governor since 1986...

Actually, since January of 1985, when Democrat Booth Gardner was inaugurated, replacing Republican John Spellman whom he defeated in 1984.

9 posted on 05/07/2003 12:10:43 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dosadi
Linda Smith could have ousted Murray if Mitch McConnell hadn't yanked financial support in the last month of the campaign.

You're the second poster at FR who has made this statement, and it's becoming something of an urban legend in Washington politics. Unfortunately, it isn't true.

The key issue in 1998 was whether Clinton should be impeached for something that was "only sex." Smith could not make the argument. When confronted with the statement, "You can't legislate morality," Smith's retort was, "You can if you have the votes." This didn't sit well with Washington's extremely secular voting base.

John Keister on KING-TV's "Almost Live" managed to define the race in one simple quip. "Patty Murray isn't the brightest star in the sky. Linda Smith's star is bright, but it has a very erratic orbit."

Smith, like Ellen Craswell, was too far to the right to win a statewide office in Washington.

The only kind of Republican who can win these statewide offices is what is known as a "Dan Evans" Republican, i.e. conservative on economic issues but liberal on social and environmental issues. Here at FR, we call these people RINO's.

10 posted on 05/07/2003 12:19:03 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
You have to realize that this is WA State. Politically, it's a mess. The Dems totally control the city of Seattle and of late, have controlled the suburbs. If you have a candidate who is considered too conservative, you'll lose the suburbs and therefore the state. The east side is solidly conservative but the population is over there. When I say "too conservative" I don't mean one can't be pro-life. They can be pro-life but they cannot support the overturning of Roe V. Wade. Any candidate who suggests that and runs on it, is doomed.

The article is probably right about Patty Murray in that she is popular - over on the West side. But it is way wrong about Gary Locke. His approval ratings aren't much better than Gray Davis's in California and people are sick of his talk, talk, talk and never any action. His rebuttal to Bush's State of the Union address in January was embarrassing and I think most WA voters saw it that way.

I think winning the Governorship is possible but getting that senate seat is going to be tough. Dunn could have done it but she declined. Nethercutt is my congressman and he's great and well respected and supported here in Eastern Washington. Whether he can cut it in Western Washington is THE QUESTION. Unfortunately, I don't have the answer.

11 posted on 05/07/2003 12:22:55 PM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Wphile, what's the status on Gary Locke running again? Is there pressure on him to retire yet? Are there other Democrats gearing up?
12 posted on 05/07/2003 12:39:03 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (That's my theory and I'm sticking to it! At least for the present . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Locke hasn't said one way or the other and he does have a democratic challenger whose name escapes me at this point. Talmadge or something like that who is running because of Locke's "abysmal lack of leadership."

So, I don't know what Locke will do. If he doesn't run, I'm not sure where he will end up. Perhaps he's thinking he'll land a VP slot - there was talk of him in 2000 with Gore - or a cabinet position should the dems win the White House.

13 posted on 05/07/2003 12:43:19 PM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ; Wphile
Former state supreme court justice Phil Talmadge is preparing to run against Locke from the left in the primary. When Locke betrayed his base in WEA (the teacher's union), he signed his political death warrant.

Talmadge is a far leftist. A "Dan Evans" Republican could isolate him on the left by eliding conservative positions and running from the center.

14 posted on 05/07/2003 12:46:23 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Thanks. I can't believe I got the name right. I agree that the Governorship is attainable for the GOP. Murray's seat is another question...unfortunately.
15 posted on 05/07/2003 12:47:40 PM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
"We don't need more RINOs in congress, who will vote against tax cuts and in favor of tax-funded abortions."

2 years ago Vance hired a so-called moderate polling outfit, (actually democRAT operatives), to figure out the voters minds in the Seattle Crescent. Several of the items the "R's" were told to stop, was being too "strident" and lose the "property rights fanaticism" at the expense of salmon restoration attempts. It sounds as if he's still following the playbook designed by liberals.

We're doomed at the state and federal level in '04. The only hope I see for the R's right now, is local races. This is where the leaders for '08 will come from. I don't see it turning around until then. We have some more pain coming our way before the dummies in the Seattle megaopolis wake up and help us vote these thieves out.

16 posted on 05/07/2003 12:48:27 PM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Murray can be beaten if someone isolates her to the left -- which is where she generally hangs out -- and runs against her from the center. Jennifer Dunn could have done it, but she has a brand new marriage and wants to retire in two or four years.

But there is hope.

We may have to go for a dark horse, but we have talent in the legislature.

17 posted on 05/07/2003 12:58:15 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Thanks for the info. I am not familiar with any of these individuals. What do you think about Nethercutt's chances were he to decide to challenge Murray?
18 posted on 05/07/2003 1:06:10 PM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
The problem with Nethercutt was his decision to violate his term limit pledge. No one will let him forget this. I don't think he can win unless Patty says something stupid again.
19 posted on 05/07/2003 3:36:59 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; CyberCowboy777
Ping.
20 posted on 05/07/2003 3:37:20 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson