Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A 'road map' drawn by fantasists
National Post ^ | May 05 2003 | Robert Fulford

Posted on 05/05/2003 9:49:20 AM PDT by knighthawk

Platoons of diplomats and politicians have solved the problems of Israel and the Palestinians -- again! The United States, the UN, Russia and the European Union, working together as "the Quartet," claim that their wisdom will produce a final settlement and an "independent, democratic and viable Palestine." Delivering their formula to both sides on Wednesday, they predicted that the crucial changes will fall into place in 2005.

The seven-page "road map" embodying these instructions appears to have been written in another world, a Never-Never Land where nobody's historical memory goes back even to the bitter failures of the 1990s. It delivers glib promises that will encourage false hopes among the naive on all sides. If you believe what it says, you can expect progress at a breathtaking pace. Among other absurdities, it anticipates that the Palestinian constitution will be written and ratified by next winter.

It's based on the foolish notion that Israelis and Palestinians will act like diplomats sitting in a conference room in Brussels. This is the error intelligence professionals call "mirror-imaging"; it's made by analysts who expect that people with different cultural experiences will act as they themselves would act. Abram Shulsky, in his book, Silent Warfare: Understanding the World of Intelligence, explains that mirror-imaging caused the failure of Israeli intelligence to anticipate the Yom Kippur sneak attack by Egypt and Syria in 1973. Israelis know their first loss in a war will be their last: Defeat will destroy their state. They imagined that Egyptians were just as afraid of losing and wouldn't attack unless they could destroy the Israeli Air Force. But apparently President Anwar Sadat didn't count on winning, and in fact his plan worked. Early Arab victories, even though they were reversed, provided the psychological backdrop (as Shulsky says) for what Sadat wanted: to regain the Sinai through a peace treaty.

In the same way, the Quartet's road map assumes that both Israelis and Palestinians will swiftly forgive and forget all the recent violence. It assumes that Palestinians want precisely the peaceful democracy that the diplomats want them to want, and that they will immediately repudiate terrorism and accept the principle of two states living side by side, a solution they rejected in 2000. It ignores the polls showing that Yasser Arafat, a career terrorist, remains the most popular living Palestinian, far more popular than the new Quartet-approved prime minister, Mahmoud Abbas, a.k.a. Abu Mazen. (Barry Rubin, the author of a forthcoming Arafat biography, noted this week that Arafat still controls security services and can nullify any change he dislikes.)

The Quartet seems also to assume that Israel will happily pull out of its settlements in disputed areas. Many outside Israel will no doubt agree, particularly if they ignore earlier generations of struggle between Arabs and Jews and blame all recent trouble on the settlements. Susan Sontag, for instance, wrote in the Guardian last Saturday that "Israel is going through the greatest crisis of its turbulent history, brought about by the policy of steadily increasing and reinforcing settlements on the territories won after its victory in the Arab war on Israel in 1967."

But Israelis know that many Arabs reject all of Israel, not just the settlements. Israelis will also point out that 225,000 Jewish settlers occupy only 2% of the West Bank. Many settlements, such as Ma'aleh Adumim, a suburb of Jerusalem with a population of 28,000, will never be casually abandoned.

The dates contained in the plan add a peculiar element of fantasy to the whole enterprise. For some arcane reason, known only to diplomats, the authors insisted on delivering a document that was already obsolete. They wrote it in December, 2002, and handed it over on April 30, 2003, with all the original dates unchanged. As a result, the text reads like the work of a grim and derisive satirist. "Phase I: Ending Terror and Violence, Present to May 2003," describes what should be done between December, 2002, and this minute. Palestinians cease all violence while Israel withdraws from Palestinian areas occupied since Sept. 28, 2000 and freezes settlement activity. Palestinian institutions (notably schools) end anti-Jewish incitement. Israel lets Palestinian officials, presumably including Arafat, travel where they wish and commits itself to a sovereign Palestinian state. At the same time, Arab governments cut off funding to terrorists. And all this fiction appears in a document claiming to establish "a realistic timeline for implementation."

Naturally, almost nothing on that list has happened. Only one item mentioned in Phase I, the naming of an interim Palestinian Prime Minister and his Cabinet, was finally carried out, just before the road map was delivered. Hamas and the Arafat-connected al-Aksa Martyrs Brigades celebrated those appointments eight hours later by sending two extra-big bombs to a Tel Aviv pub, apparently in an attempt to set a record for deaths by suicide bombers on a single occasion. The terrorists were thwarted by an alert security officer, and they set off only one bomb, which killed one terrorist and three Israelis while injuring dozens of others. It was the start of another peace process.

robert.fulford@utoronto.ca


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arafat; fantasists; israel; roadmap; terrorism

1 posted on 05/05/2003 9:49:20 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; Squantos; ...
Ping
2 posted on 05/05/2003 9:49:48 AM PDT by knighthawk (Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Regarding the Roadmap, it’s stupid because it’s forcing Israel to negotiate with terrorist. It is rewarding terror and, in effect, is going to create a terrorist state next door to Israel. Israel already is bordered by two other terrorist states with Lebanon and Syria. We are fighting a war on terror and Israel is one of our allies in that war, yet we are forcing Israel to negotiate with terrorist and reward terrorism? If we are truly serious about wiping out terrorist, why don’t we go into the disputed territories, Lebanon, and Syria and wipe out the terrorist? What is wrong with our stupid state department?
3 posted on 05/05/2003 9:59:16 AM PDT by Turbodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Why do the Palastinians want Israel so much?

Why can't they just enjoy life in Jordan, which was originally set up as a Palastinian state?

When I hear history from Israel's supporters and then hear it from Palastine's supporters, I don't even think they're talking about the same events.

I think the real problem is that Palastinian "leaders" would rather be terrorists than nation builders, and unfortunately the Palastinian on the street follows their lead.

Why do people care about real estate which, quite honestly, strikes me as far from an ideal place to live? If I were Palastinian, I'd cheerfully renounce any claim I had on Israel for some equivalent-sized Carribean island. And wouldn't that be a lot cheaper to provide than all this tiresome war?

Of course if I was Israeli, I'd prefer the island too. :-)

D
4 posted on 05/05/2003 10:10:45 AM PDT by daviddennis (Visit amazing.com for protest accounts, video & more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Allan
Ping.

Fulford's right.

5 posted on 05/05/2003 10:23:39 AM PDT by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis
Why do people care about real estate which, quite honestly, strikes me as far from an ideal place to live?

They don't want the real estate. They want the Jews to be dead.

6 posted on 05/05/2003 10:25:12 AM PDT by Alouette (Why is it called "International Law" if only Israel and the United States are expected to keep it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
It's all about beachfront property.
7 posted on 05/05/2003 10:27:46 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Consort
It's all about beachfront property.

The Palestinians are the only people on the planet who can take prime beachfront property (Gaza) and turn it into the world's largest open-air sewer.

8 posted on 05/05/2003 10:32:03 AM PDT by Alouette (Why is it called "International Law" if only Israel and the United States are expected to keep it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
9 posted on 05/05/2003 10:50:33 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This world is not our home, for we are just passing through, but an Islamic will never believe that. So the Islamics are looking for territory, but what good will this do them, if they gain the whole world and lose their own soul? No, they will not be able to understand this.
10 posted on 05/05/2003 12:35:37 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This world is not our home, for we are just passing through, but an Islamic will never believe that. So the Islamics are looking for territory, but what good will this do them, if they gain the whole world and lose their own soul? No, they will not be able to understand this.
11 posted on 05/05/2003 12:36:09 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk; SJackson
The dates contained in the plan add a peculiar element of fantasy to the whole enterprise. For some arcane reason, known only to diplomats, the authors insisted on delivering a document that was already obsolete. They wrote it in December, 2002, and handed it over on April 30, 2003, with all the original dates unchanged. As a result, the text reads like the work of a grim and derisive satirist.

I understand that without Israel's revision, and approval of the road map it would be a defeat for Sharon, and it may also divide his party potentially leading to elections or opening the way for the centrist Labor to join him in government.

12 posted on 05/05/2003 7:19:28 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson