If this is what they do, then he wants to be a neocon, too

Star Newspapers (Chicago south suburbs) ^ | Sunday, May 4, 2003 | Michael J. Bowers Star columnist

[Chipata]

"Shouldn't it be "anti-Levite"?"

A small and quite unimportant truth. Really it should be Jew hater.

[Mr. Mojo]

Moment of truth arriving on Bush's American interest two-state, two year Israel/Palestine peace plan. Which 'neo-cons' (Christian or Jewish) will support Bush and which will support Sharon?

Bush and Sharon are on the same page on this issue. .....And btw, it's a non-issue. This 'roadmap' is nothing but a device to placate the Arab masses (and their gov'ts) while we take care of the business at hand in the Middle East. Both Bush and Sharon know that a "Palestinian" state will never happen.

[Joe Hadenuf]

But no one will ever be able to call *him* a racist or Jew hater like certain other posters who infest FreeRepublic.

LOL! Save the script for someone else. I don't buy that crap....

[Chipata]

"The Buchanan-cons = America first, constitution loving, abortion hating patriots."

The reality:

"America hating, constitution distorting, traitors."

It doesn't help that they are also quite evil Jew haters either. Buchanan would have been America's answer to Hitler, but Americans had far too much sense.

[Chipata]

"Save the script for someone else. I don't buy that crap"

It's not what you're buying that concerns me, it's the vile ideology that you peddle that is the issue.

You are the very worst of America: The bigot and philistine.

[wardaddy]

Because it was appropriated by 20th century media.

[Joe Hadenuf]

You just see an American firster, behind every rock. Some of you people are obsessed with Hitler! Don't be so dang paranoid. LOL! Put it behind you pal.......

[Joe Hadenuf]

LOL!

[ex-snook]

"It doesn't help that they are also quite evil Jew haters either. Buchanan would have been America's answer to Hitler, but Americans had far too much sense. "

[Chi-townChief]

What's confusing is that I have been called a neo-con by folks here as well as by some liberal friends and the term is pretty elusive. What it seems is that the "Paleos" are generally isolationist and the "Neos" are generally internationalist (and even this doesn't always seem to hold true) and the rest of the rhetoric is all window dressing.

[PRND21]

Agreed.

[jmc813]

Dorque.

[wardaddy]

American conservatives and Israel's interest converge in my view primarily because of cultural (and some religious) kinship....not unlike that which we have with Britain or Australia....or used to have with Canada. I see nothing wrong with that. I prefer for my tax dollars to go to help folks I like or share my values more or less more so than to those who despise us. Israelis like us very much...I know this personally.

There has been a concerted effort by a few on this forum lately to define paleo and neo conservative on their own terms. I personally think that they are both very ill fitting labels. Many folks here are a hybrid of both and not all paleos are isolationists nor are all neos Jewish by any stretch.

[Chipata]

It's you who are the sh*t, bud.

[Joe Hadenuf]

LOL! LOL!

What took you so long PRND21 . Let me guess, PRND means Phony Rightwing Neo Democrat?

[Alouette]

[Joe Hadenuf]

Yes, it's this Sh*t again! LOL.....

Gawd, these guys see Hitler behind every dang door......What's up with that?

[Joe Hadenuf]

HAHAHA......Here comes the cute graphics.......Right on time...

Man another paranoid weirdo.......

Hey Alouette, looked under your bed lately? He could be there...

[Joe Hadenuf]

Been fun guys, but I got to run to a late breakfast, steak and eggs, you know, (Nazi food) down at the local beer hall. Hehehe.....See you all at the bookburning party.....

Gawd I love this stuff.....