Replies

I firmly believe that the law enforcement of the U.S. should not be allowed to posses any firearm, munition, and related articles,(flash granades) that the general public can't.

If police can have a suppresor, so should I if I choose. If they can buy a .50 BMG and mount it on an APC so should I, if I choose.

This article is only a half step toward justice, making the law and their "toys" on the same platform as the general public is only proper.

If police can have a suppresor, so should I if I choose. If they can buy a .50 BMG and mount it on an APC so should I, if I choose.

Regarding suppressors, it is a remarkable bit of hypocricy for these antis to demand that ranges be closed because "there's too much noise," yet if you raise the issue of having silencers to avoid such a "problem" (which most of these antis move to, as ranges have usually been in place for a long while), they decry your desire to own such a "criminal" device. Well, which is it, too noisy or not? The truth is that they just want to ban guns, and too much noise is a good way to get ranges closed and make it much more inconvenient to practice (and, thus, to own guns).