Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals meet unexpected resistance ^ | Thursday, May 1, 2003 | by Ann Coulter

Posted on 04/30/2003 10:35:26 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

Though many had anticipated a cakewalk for the media in undermining the war on terrorism, instead liberals are caught in a quagmire of good news about the war. Predictions that liberals would have an easy time embarrassing President Bush have met unexpected resistance. They're still looking for the bad news they said was there. Experts believe the media's quagmire results from severely reduced troops. The left's current force is less than half the size of the coalition media that undermined the Vietnam War.

It's been a tough few weeks all around for the anti-war crowd. On Sunday, the London Telegraph reported that documents had been discovered in Baghdad linking Saddam Hussein to Osama bin Laden. Hussein and bin Laden had a working relationship as far back as 1998, based on their mutual hatred of America and Saudi Arabia. As we go to print, it's Day Four of the New York Times' refusal to mention these documents.

Government documents have also been found in Iraq showing that a leading anti-war spokesman in Britain, Member of Parliament George Galloway, was in Saddam Hussein's pay. Scott Ritter, former U.N. arms inspector turned peacenik turned suspected pederast, immediately defended Galloway in a column in the London Guardian. With any luck, Tariq Aziz will now step in to defend Ritter.

At least Tariq Aziz knows he lost the war. American liberals are still hoping for a comeback. But the war was so successful, they don't have any arguments left. They can't even sound busy. In their usual parody of patriotism, liberals are masters of the long-winded statement that amounts to nothing. They can't go on TV and say nothing. But all they have are some broken figurines to complain about.

They said chemical weapons would be used against our troops. That didn't happen. They predicted huge civilian casualties. That didn't happen. They said Americans would turn against the war as our troops came home in body bags. That didn't happen. They warned of a mammoth terrorist attack in America if we invaded Iraq. That didn't happen. Just two weeks ago, they claimed American troops were caught in another Vietnam quagmire. That didn't happen.

Now the biggest mishap liberals can seize on is that some figurines from an Iraqi museum were broken – a relief to college students everywhere who have ever been forced to gaze upon Mesopotamian pottery. We're not talking about Rodins here. So the Iraqis looted. Oh well. Wars are messy. Liberalism is part of a religious disorder that demands a belief that life is controllable.

At least we finally got liberals on the record against looting. It seems the looting in Iraq compared unfavorably with the "rebellion" in Los Angeles after the Rodney King verdict. When "rebels" in Los Angeles began looting, liberals said it was a sign of frustration – they were poor and hungry. As someone noted at the time, apparently they were thirsty as well, since they hit a lot of liquor stores. Meanwhile, the Iraqis were pretty careful about targeting the precise source of their oppression. Their looting concentrated on Saddam's palace, official government buildings – and the French cultural center.

However many precious pots were stolen, it has to be said: The Iraqi people behaved considerably better than the French did after Americans liberated Paris. Thousands of Frenchmen were killed by other Frenchmen on allegations of collaboration with the Nazis. Subsequent scholarship has shown that charges of "collaboration" were often nothing more than a settling of personal grudges and family feuds. This was made simple by the fact that so many Frenchmen really did collaborate with the Nazis. The French didn't seem to resent the Nazi occupation very much. Nazi occupation is their default position. They began squirming only after Americans came in and imposed democracy on them.

Despondent over the success of the war in Iraq, liberals tried to cheer themselves up with the politics of personal destruction – their second favorite hobby after defending Saddam Hussein. Responding to the question of whether the Supreme Court should hold sodomy to be a fundamental constitutional right, Republican Sen. Rick Santorum made the blindingly obvious point that a general right to engage in consensual sex would logically include adultery, polygamy and any number of sex acts prohibited by the states.

For the limited purpose of attacking Santorum, liberals agreed to stipulate that adultery is bad. After spending all of 1998 ferociously defending adultery as something "everyone" does and "everyone" lies about, liberals claimed to be shocked to the core that anyone would compare homosexuality to such a morally black sin as adultery. (While we're in a sensitive mood, how about the name "the DIXIE Chicks"? Isn't that name provocative to African-Americans?)

When you get liberals to come out against both looting and adultery in the same week, you know the left is in a state of total disarray. They shouldn't feel so bad. Their boys put up a good fight in Iraq for 17 days.

TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; dems; iraqifreedom; quagmire
Thursday, May 1, 2003

Quote of the Day by legman

1 posted on 04/30/2003 10:35:26 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The Left's causes' always seem to be at odds with smoothing running government. It really seems obvious that the Left just tries to muddle the political scene with so many obstacles (issues to them) that conservatives end up "letting" some slide by unopposed. The truths now know is that opposition to all liberal/left issues forces an honest soul searching that normally results in mature minds prevailing.... Mature minds, kind of the same theme Churchill espoused in Britain in the 1930s, e.g., “if you’ve not a liberal at 18 then you have no passion, but if by 40 years of age you are not a conservative based upon your experience of raising a family and paying bills…..”
2 posted on 04/30/2003 11:12:05 PM PDT by Jumper (All Hale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Coulter rocks...I just ordered her new book "Treason" on Amazon. I also highly recommend Mona Charen's "Useful Idiots" and Tammy Bruce's "The Death of Right and Wrong" releases

3 posted on 04/30/2003 11:42:21 PM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003

double bump!

4 posted on 04/30/2003 11:47:01 PM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Coulter strikes again!
5 posted on 05/01/2003 3:42:33 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Anyone else like to see Ann Coulter in a thong bikini?

Smart, conservative and beautiful

(note: I know I'm a pig)
6 posted on 05/01/2003 10:19:45 AM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
She's way too skinny. Cute enough, but not gorgeous as many here seem to think. I'm sorry, but I don't think she's that hot.

Besides, look at the first pic in post in the series of 3 Fox/Hannity & Colmes pix in post 4; she's got an Adam's Apple!

7 posted on 05/01/2003 10:24:29 AM PDT by RayBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RayBob
"She's way too skinny. Cute enough, but not gorgeous as many here seem to think. I'm sorry, but I don't think she's that hot.

Besides, look at the first pic in post in the series of 3 Fox/Hannity & Colmes pix in post 4; she's got an Adam's Apple!"

The ol... anti-adams apple ploy... maybe not "hot" per se... but the package needs little improvement.

8 posted on 05/01/2003 10:28:24 AM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RayBob
You sure that's an adams apple? I thought only men had those.
9 posted on 05/01/2003 10:30:25 AM PDT by justshe (I'm #6 on the top ten list of lairs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: justshe
That's my point...
10 posted on 05/01/2003 10:45:52 AM PDT by RayBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RayBob
So what's the scoop on Ann Coulter's Adam's apple? Google returns 67 hits on "Ann Coulter Adam's apple", Teoma 517, WiseNut 782.
11 posted on 05/01/2003 10:53:46 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Subvert the conspiracy of inanimate objects!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RayBob
That's a prominent thyroid, not an Adam's Apple.
12 posted on 05/01/2003 7:01:52 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This is one of Coulter's best in a while.

She rips the Left apart on their hypocrisy 1-2-3. They are truly a party in disarray.

And George Bush is the man with the plan. He needs to head down to the Capitol one of these nights for a prime-time joint session and tells this Congress that their job is to remove the brakes from this economy by passing HIS economic plan. Tax cuts. Elimination of useless programs.

He needs to tell them that Americans are looking for more jobs and more opportunities. He needs to tel them that thousands of entrepreneurs are willing to take risks to create these jobs. But not if their reward is stolen by the government as tax.

Excessive taxation tilts the risk-reward balance too far to the federal "house" favor. And many people just choose not to play. It's no different than a casino.

I want this President to quickly use some of this post-Iraq period to blast these Senators out of their stupor. As the President said last night, the "Turning of the Tide". Once we get this economy tide turned, America's rebirth will be well on the way.
13 posted on 05/02/2003 3:28:58 AM PDT by RobFromGa (WE NEED A TAX CUT NOW !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

14 posted on 05/02/2003 6:29:15 AM PDT by RayBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson